Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Opinion Preview

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

Experience a New Era in Legal Research with Free Access to Lexis+

  • Case Opinion

Wade v. State

Wade v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

December 11, 2014, Decided

No. SC13-1003

Opinion

 [*1009] PER CURIAM.

Alan Lyndell Wade appeals an order of the circuit court denying his motion to vacate his convictions and sentences—including two convictions for first-degree murder and two sentences of death—filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed below, we affirm the postconviction court's order.

I. BACKGROUND

Wade was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder, two counts of kidnapping,  [*1010]  and two counts of robbery in connection with the murders of Carol and Reggie Sumner in July 2005. Wade v. State, 41 So. 3d 857, 862 (Fla. 2010). Wade and his codefendants, Michael Jackson and Tiffany Cole, were tried separately for the crimes. Bruce Nixon was also involved in the crimes but pleaded guilty to two counts of second-degree murder and received concurrent sentences [**2]  of forty-five years in prison.

In the opinion addressing Wade's direct appeal, this Court set out the facts of the crimes:

At Wade's trial, the evidence established the following. At the time of the murders, Wade had known codefendant Jackson for at least a year. In the summer of 2005, Wade had visited and partied with Jackson and his girlfriend Cole in South Carolina. In June, Wade arrived at his longtime friend Nixon's home in Jacksonville, driving a Mazda RX-8 that Cole had rented in South Carolina. Wade told Nixon of a vague plan to rob someone but offered no specifics. The next time Wade contacted Nixon was two evenings before the July 8 murders. Wade called and asked whether Nixon would like to join him, Jackson, and Cole in digging a hole. Nixon agreed and purloined four shovels from his neighborhood before his three codefendants appeared at his home in the Mazda.

The foursome drove around before deciding on a good location for the hole—a remote, wooded area located just across the state line in Georgia. Leaving the car parked on the road, the foursome hiked into the woods, where the three men dug a large, deep hole, while Cole held a flashlight. When the group returned to the [**3]  car, Wade asked Jackson whether Nixon could join their robbery plan, and Jackson agreed. The group then went to Wade's house but left when Wade's mother ordered Jackson out of her home. She considered Jackson a bad influence on her son.

Read The Full CaseNot a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free.

Full case includes Shepard's, Headnotes, Legal Analytics from Lex Machina, and more.

156 So. 3d 1004 *; 2014 Fla. LEXIS 3679 **; 39 Fla. L. Weekly S 757

ALAN LYNDELL WADE, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Subsequent History: Released for Publication February 4, 2015.

Rehearing denied by Wade v. State, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 211 (Fla., Feb. 4, 2015)

Motion denied by, Petition denied by Wade v. State, 2022 Fla. LEXIS 993 (Fla., June 27, 2022)

Prior History:  [**1] An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Duval County, Michael R. Weatherby, Judge - Case No. 162005CF010263BXXXMA.

Wade v. State, 41 So. 3d 857, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 687 (Fla., May 6, 2010)

CORE TERMS

trial counsel, postconviction, murder, ineffective, recording, jurors, trial court, codefendants, photographs, hearsay, objected, argues, phone, mitigating factors, penalty phase, mitigation, contends, sentence, brain, death penalty, kidnapping, robbery, hotel, law enforcement officer, evidentiary hearing, aggravating factor, strategic decision, duct tape, outweighed, credibility

Constitutional Law, Fundamental Rights, Criminal Process, Assistance of Counsel, Criminal Law & Procedure, Standards of Review, De Novo Review, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Counsel, Effective Assistance of Counsel, Tests for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Deferential Review, Trials, Search Warrants, Probable Cause, Particularity Requirement, Totality of Circumstances Test, General Overview, Search & Seizure, Accessories, Aiding & Abetting, Evidence, Hearsay, Exceptions, Relevance, Relevant Evidence, Admissibility, Conduct Evidence, Prior Acts, Crimes & Wrongs, Impeachment, One's Own Witnesses, Credibility of Witnesses, Prior Inconsistent Statements, Rule Components, Statements, Testimony, Lay Witnesses, Sentencing, Capital Punishment, Mitigating Circumstances, Sentencing, Mental Incapacity, Trials, Bench Trials, Weight & Sufficiency, Witnesses, Credibility, Appeals, Aggravating Circumstances, Juries & Jurors, Voir Dire, Challenges for Cause, Bias & Impartiality, Pretrial Proceedings