The judgment of the appellate court reversing the district court's order granting habeas corpus relief to the inmate was affirmed.

Judgment affirming the denial of appellant corporation's motion to dismiss an order and notice of assessment of delinquent contributions entered by appellee state was affirmed. The conduct of appellant corporation's salesmen in soliciting business in the forum state was sufficient minimum contact with the state to subject appellant to suit for a liability to the state unemployment compensation fund that arose...

The Court reversed the judgment that suppressed evidence against respondents, a husband and wife, because the suppression was based on an erroneous application of an overly rigid and technical standard for determining whether a confidential informant's tip established probable cause; under the proper, commonsense approach, the corroboration by police of the facts of the tip established probable cause to believe that...

The Court affirmed the judgment although it found that the rule of civil procedure was inapplicable to the case. Petitioner had not shown the necessity or justification needed to secure the written statements, private memoranda, and personal recollections that were prepared or formed by respondents' counsel in the course of the counsel's legal duties.

The Supreme Court vacated the award of respondents' attorney fees and remanded the case for a determination of which fees were reasonable.

Judgment reversed; plaintiff's contract action was improperly reinstated, as there was no evidence that his at-will status was altered by an implied contract. Plaintiff's implied covenant cause of action claim was properly dismissed. Plaintiff failed to show that defendant's proffered reasons for its actions were a pretext for prohibited age discrimination. Plaintiff's claim that defendant breached its...

The court vacated and remanded the judgment of the appellate court.

The Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the state court. 9-0 Decision.

The Court reversed the appellate court's judgment and the trial court's conviction of defendant and remanded the case for a new trial.

The court reversed the state supreme court's holding that a criminal defendant never had the right to challenge the veracity of a sworn statement used by police to procure a search warrant. The court held that the Fourth Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the derivative exclusionary rule allowed petitioner, under the facts of his case, to attack the veracity of the warrant's affidavit after the warrant had...

The Court reversed the judgment and remanded the cause was remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion, which was that the appellate court should have treated the appeal from the denial of the motions as an effective, although inept, attempt to appeal from the judgment sought to be vacated.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals was vacated and the case was remanded for further proceedings.

The lower court's reversal of a judgment entered in favor of petitioner in an action against respondent under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for a sexually hostile work environment created by her supervisors, was reversed and remanded for reinstatement of the original judgment after the court held that employers may be held liable for actionable discrimination, subject to a defense based on reasonableness...

The Court reversed the judgment because the EPA's interpretation of the statute was a permissible construction and entitled to deference, where the legislative history of the statute was silent as to the instant issue.

The Court affirmed the judgment of the appellate court.

One North Dakota judgment reversed, another vacated; Minnesota judgment affirmed. 5-3 Decision; 2 Concurrences; 2 Dissents.

The Court affirmed the judgment of the state supreme court. 5-4 decision; 1 concurrence; 2 dissents.

The judgment was affirmed in that many of the acts upon which the employee's hostile environment claim depended were allowed to be considered despite having had occurred outside the 300 day filing period. The judgement was reversed as to that part which held that so long as one act falls within the period, discriminatory and retaliatory acts that are plausibly or sufficiently related to that act may also be considered...

The order of the appellate division was reversed with costs, the doctor's motion for summary judgment was granted, and the certified question was answered in the negative.

The appellate court's judgment was affirmed.

The court reversed the order.

Judgment of court of appeal reversed; case remanded.

The court of appeals' judgment was reversed. 5-4 decision; 1 concurrence in part, as to Rule 23(b)(2) issue, and dissent in part, as to Rule 23(a)(2) issue.

The judgment was reversed because petitioner's low- and mid-level employees' information was protected by the attorney-client privilege where it was necessary to defend against potential litigation, and the work-product doctrine applied to tax summonses. The court remanded the case for a determination as to whether the work-product doctrine applied, and to allow respondent to show a necessity for the disclosure...

The court affirmed a judgment that affirmed petitioner's conviction for carrying a concealed weapon because the "stop and frisk" tactics used by the police in the search of petitioner's person and the seizure of the weapon produced from the search were reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, as the arresting officer reasonably concluded that petitioner was armed and was about to engage in criminal activity...