The judgment was affirmed.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals was reversed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.

The Court affirmed the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

The judgment holding that the debtor forfeited the timeliness issue was affirmed.

The United States Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the appellate court and remanded the case for further proceedings.

The Court affirmed the judgment.

The Court reversed the judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings.

The Court affirmed the judgment of the state appellate court.

The judgment upholding the denial of habeas corpus relief was reversed, and the case was remanded for consideration of the inmate's procedurally barred claims.

The judgment of the South Carolina Supreme Court was vacated and the case was remanded for further proceedings.

The Seventh Circuit's judgment was reversed.

The Supreme Court vacated the appellate court's judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Although the lower court properly concluded that the FAA confined its expedited judicial review to the grounds listed in the FAA, the judgment was vacated and the case was remanded for further proceedings. 6 majority; 2 dissents.

The Court reversed that portion of the district court's decision granting respondents summary judgment with respect to liability and remanded the case for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The judgment was affirmed.

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia was affirmed.

The Court reversed the appellate court's judgment.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals was affirmed. 6-3 Decision; 1 Dissent.

The judgment of the Seventh Circuit was reversed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings.

The writ of certiorari seeking review of the lower court's holding that removal could not have rested on the federal common law of foreign relations was dismissed. The judgment was otherwise affirmed.

The Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Assuming respondent was not disqualified from exercising Second Amendment rights, the Court held that the District must permit respondent to register his handgun and must issue him a license to carry it in his home. 5-4 Decision; 2 Dissents.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals was affirmed.

The judgment of the Sixth Circuit was vacated in part as to the invalidation of the franchise tax credit, and the cases were remanded for dismissal of the challenge to the franchise tax credit.

The court reversed the judgment and remanded the action for consideration of the purchaser's cost recovery claim and implied right of contribution claim.

The judgment denying the officer's claim of qualified immunity was reversed, and the case was remanded to address whether respondent could pursue a claim of liability for a substantive due process violation, and the scope and merits of any such claim.