The court affirmed the appellate court's grant of partial summary judgment to the insured, holding that the actions were covered as suits seeking damages. The court reversed and remanded the appellate court's grant of summary judgment to defendant insurers, except one, on the pollution exclusion issue, construing the policy term in favor of the insured and finding issues of material fact.

The court affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding that the adoption of the plan was within the directors' authority and was a reasonable defensive mechanism adopted in the good faith belief that it was necessary to protect the corporation from coercive acquisition techniques.

The court replaced the common law defense of contributory negligence with system of comparative fault, held that the criminal presumption of intoxication established by statute was admissible evidence, and remanded case to the trial court for a new trial utilizing the comparative fault system.

The dismissal of the inmate's motion to vacate his sentence was affirmed.

The judgment reversing defendant's sentence was reversed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings. 7-2 decision; one concurrence; two dissents.

The judgments of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit were reversed, and the cases were remanded.

The court reversed and the cause was remanded for further proceedings.

The court reversed the superior court's judgment, finding that if the patient were competent to make determination she would have chosen to have her nasogastric tube withdrawn and that her freedom from nonconsensual invasion of her bodily integrity would outweigh any state interest in preserving life. The court stated that rejecting artificial feeding would not constitute attempted suicide and removal of the tube...

The court approved the decision and held that respondent's fraudulent inducement claim against petitioner was an independent tort and was not barred by the economic loss rule.

The court affirmed the order of the intermediate appellate court that denied a punitive damages award in Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (Act) violation case because there was no provision that allowed for punitive damages, where the Act contemplated only remedial measures. The court affirmed the order that found there was no intentional infliction of emotional distress because the conduct was not so outrageous and there...

The judgment affirming that part of the trial court's judgment awarding damages under the tort theory was reversed. The court remanded the cause to the trial court for it to render judgment for the appropriate damages under the employee's sexual harassment claim.

The court reversed the order affirming dismissal of petitioner injured's action against respondent tortfeasor for damages because it overruled the common law doctrine of lex loci delicti, and remanded for determination of the substantive law based upon the most significant relationship test.

The court affirmed the judgment in favor of the grocers.

The court affirmed, finding no cause of action for wrongful discharge. Appellant's complaint demonstrated a legitimate reason for appellee's termination of the employment relationship and the termination did not violate any clear mandate of public policy.

The Court reversed the judgment of the court of appeals. 7-2 decision; 2 concurrences; 2 dissents.

The court reversed the judgment that affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff's action against defendant, seeking actual and punitive damages for retaliatory discharge, because plaintiff's complaint, in alleging that she was discharged for filing a claim pursuant to Indiana's Workmen's Compensation statutes, stated a claim upon which relief could be granted. The court remanded the case.

The reviewing court reversed and remanded the appellate court's judgment compelling plaintiffs, family members and estate representatives, to submit to arbitration with defendant health maintenance organization (HMO). Because material fact questions existed as to whether defendant HMO's conduct in delaying arbitration was actually fraudulent and constituted a waiver of its right to compel arbitration, reversal...

The Court affirmed the judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington. The Court reversed the judgment of the Supreme Court of Indiana and remanded the case for proceedings not inconsistent with the Court's opinion.

The court vacated the judgment of the Veterans Court and left it to the Veterans Court to determine in the first instance on remand what further proceedings might be required.

The court of appeal's judgment was reversed as to the sentence, and the case was remanded for further proceedings.

The judgment upholding defendant's conviction was reversed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings.

The decision of the district court was affirmed.

The court modified the judgment of the court of appeal to direct the superior court to conform its order on standing to reflect that only those petitioner class-members on whose behalf or for whose benefit services were rendered had standing to sue for negligence. The duty owed was to those who were aware that funeral or crematory services were being performed, and on whose behalf or for whose benefit the services were...

The Court affirmed the judgment of the appellate court.

The judgment of the Washington Court of Appeals was reversed, and the case was remanded for further proceedings.