LexisNexisCase Summary
Sign In to Lexis Advance
  • Tags
  • Subscribe by email
  • More
  • Cancel
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Schnabel v. Superior Court

    The court affirmed, in part, the disclosure of appellant's personal financial and payroll records, as well as general corporate documents because appellee was entitled to ascertain the value of shares. The court reversed in part and prohibited the disclosure of payroll and tax records of corporate employees' because the employees had privacy rights in their financial data.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Rent-A-Center, W., Inc. v. Jackson

    The court of appeals' judgment was reversed. 5-4 Decision; 1 Dissent.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins

    The Court reversed and remanded the case to the lower court, holding that defendant employer had to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that its employment decision relating to plaintiff employee was not motivated by a discriminatory purpose.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Payton v. New York

    The Court reversed and remanded the cases for further proceedings because the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments prohibited the police from making warrantless and nonconsensual entry into suspects' homes in order to make routine felony arrests.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP

    Judgment affirmed. Unanimous decision; 1 concurrence.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius

    The court of appeals’ judgment was reversed insofar as it struck down § 5000A and permitted withdrawal of all Medicaid funding under § 1396c. The judgment was otherwise affirmed. 5-4 Decision; 3 opinions; 1 concurrence in part and dissent in part; 2 dissents.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Montgomery v. Louisiana

    Judgment reversed; case remanded. 6-3 decision; two dissents.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    McDonald v. City of Chicago

    The court of appeals' judgment was reversed, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings. 5-4 Decision, 2 Concurrences, 2 Dissents.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Matter of Kapon v. Koch

    Appellate court's order affirmed.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Lafler v. Cooper

    The judgment upholding the grant of the writ of habeas corpus and directing that the plea bargain be enforced was vacated, and the case was remanded for remedial action. 5-4 Decision; 2 Dissents.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia v. Hall

    The Supreme Court reversed the state court's judgment that found the corporation subject to the in personam jurisdiction of the state courts.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Harrington v. Richter

    The judgment granting habeas relief was reversed. The case was remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion. 8-0 Decision; 1 Concurrence.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Georgia v. Randolph

    The judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia was affirmed.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc.

    The appellate court's decision was reversed; the appellate court erred in concluding that petitioners' claim for civil penalties had to be dismissed as moot when respondent, albeit after commencement of the litigation, came into compliance.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Fort Bend Cty. v. Davis

    Decision affirmed. Unanimous Court.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Forman v Henkin

    Judgment reversed.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan

    The Court affirmed the judgment of the court of appeals.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP

    The judgment of the intermediate appellate court was affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings. The judgment was affirmed to the extent the appellate court held that the noncompetition agreement was invalid, but the judgment was reversed to the extent it held that the TONC was invalid.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Colo. River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States

    The judgment of the intermediate appellate court was reversed, and the district court's judgment dismissing the government's complaint against the water users was affirmed.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez

    The Supreme Court affirmed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's judgment and remanded the case. 6-3 Decision; 1 concurrence; 2 dissents.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Blank v. Kirwan

    Order dismissing plaintiff's complaint affirmed, because defendants did not engage in unfair competition as an illegal business practice. The court further found that defendants' acts regarding operation of poker clubs were protected by the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Ariz. v. Youngblood

    The judgment was reversed and the case was remanded for further proceedings.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.

    The court reversed the judgment of the court of appeal, and remanded for further proceedings.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    American Master Lease LLC v. Idanta Partners, Ltd.

    The court reversed as to the amount of unjust enrichment, remanded with directions to the trial court to grant a new trial on that issue, and affirmed in all other respects.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • 30 Sep 2019

    Amchem Prods. v. Windsor

    The court affirmed the judgment of the appellate court denying class certification because the class did not satisfy the requirements of common issue predominance and adequacy of representation.
<>
LexisNexis

LexisNexis is proud to help Advance the Rule of Law. Learn more

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis All Rights Reserved
LexisNexis