The court affirmed, in part, the disclosure of appellant's personal financial and payroll records, as well as general corporate documents because appellee was entitled to ascertain the value of shares. The court reversed in part and prohibited the disclosure of payroll and tax records of corporate employees' because the employees had privacy rights in their financial data.

The court of appeals' judgment was reversed. 5-4 Decision; 1 Dissent.

The Court reversed and remanded the case to the lower court, holding that defendant employer had to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that its employment decision relating to plaintiff employee was not motivated by a discriminatory purpose.

The Court reversed and remanded the cases for further proceedings because the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments prohibited the police from making warrantless and nonconsensual entry into suspects' homes in order to make routine felony arrests.

Judgment affirmed. Unanimous decision; 1 concurrence.

The court of appeals’ judgment was reversed insofar as it struck down § 5000A and permitted withdrawal of all Medicaid funding under § 1396c. The judgment was otherwise affirmed. 5-4 Decision; 3 opinions; 1 concurrence in part and dissent in part; 2 dissents.

Judgment reversed; case remanded. 6-3 decision; two dissents.

The court of appeals' judgment was reversed, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings. 5-4 Decision, 2 Concurrences, 2 Dissents.

Appellate court's order affirmed.

The judgment upholding the grant of the writ of habeas corpus and directing that the plea bargain be enforced was vacated, and the case was remanded for remedial action. 5-4 Decision; 2 Dissents.

The Supreme Court reversed the state court's judgment that found the corporation subject to the in personam jurisdiction of the state courts.

The judgment granting habeas relief was reversed. The case was remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion. 8-0 Decision; 1 Concurrence.

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia was affirmed.

The appellate court's decision was reversed; the appellate court erred in concluding that petitioners' claim for civil penalties had to be dismissed as moot when respondent, albeit after commencement of the litigation, came into compliance.

Decision affirmed. Unanimous Court.

Judgment reversed.

The Court affirmed the judgment of the court of appeals.

The judgment of the intermediate appellate court was affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings. The judgment was affirmed to the extent the appellate court held that the noncompetition agreement was invalid, but the judgment was reversed to the extent it held that the TONC was invalid.

The judgment of the intermediate appellate court was reversed, and the district court's judgment dismissing the government's complaint against the water users was affirmed.

The Supreme Court affirmed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's judgment and remanded the case. 6-3 Decision; 1 concurrence; 2 dissents.

Order dismissing plaintiff's complaint affirmed, because defendants did not engage in unfair competition as an illegal business practice. The court further found that defendants' acts regarding operation of poker clubs were protected by the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine.

The judgment was reversed and the case was remanded for further proceedings.

The court reversed the judgment of the court of appeal, and remanded for further proceedings.

The court reversed as to the amount of unjust enrichment, remanded with directions to the trial court to grant a new trial on that issue, and affirmed in all other respects.

The court affirmed the judgment of the appellate court denying class certification because the class did not satisfy the requirements of common issue predominance and adequacy of representation.