Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Brief

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

  • Law School Case Brief

Commonwealth v. Stephenson - 25 Mass. 354 (1829)

Rule:

The lifting a latch and opening the door, though not bolted or locked; the shoving up a window, though not fastened; the getting down a chimney, and various other acts done to effect an entry, are held to be a breaking. 

Facts:

Defendants contended that the trial court improperly instructed the jury as to what constituted a breaking. The trial court instructed the jury that if defendants broke, cut, or tore away a net fastened to a window, it constituted a breaking of the dwelling house. The defendants were convicted of burglary.

Issue:

Was the jury properly instructed as to what constituted a breaking?

Answer:

Yes.

Conclusion:

The court held that the jury was properly instructed. The court held that the net was nailed down on all sides and was torn away by defendants. It did not matter that the net was only made of twine.

Access the full text case

Essential Class Preparation Skills

  • How to Answer Your Professor's Questions
  • How to Brief a Case
  • Don't Miss Important Points of Law with BARBRI Outlines (Login Required)

Essential Class Resources

  • CivPro
  • Contracts
  • Constitutional Law
  • Corporations /Business Organizations
  • Criminal Law
  • Criminal Procedure/Investigation
  • Evidence
  • Legal Ethics/Professional Responsibility
  • Property
  • Secured Transactions
  • Torts
  • Trusts & Estates