Use this button to switch between dark and light mode.

Share your feedback on this Case Brief

Thank You For Submiting Feedback!

  • Law School Case Brief

In re Estate of Williams - 182 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 1965)

Rule:

A mark made by the testator at the proper place on his will with the intent that it constitute his signature and evidence his assent to the will is sufficient to satisfy the statutory requirement that he sign his will.

Facts:

The testator signed his will in the presence of witnesses by using a mark, similar to an X, instead of writing his own name. The lower courts refused to admit this will into probate on the ground that mark was not a sufficient signing of the will under Fla. Stat. Ann. ch. 731.07. Petitioner, administrator of decedent's estate, appealed. 

Issue:

Could the mark be considered a sufficient signing of the will under Fla. Stat. Ann. ch. 731.07? 

Answer:

Yes.

Conclusion:

The court reversed the judgment, holding that under Fla. Stat. Ann. 731.07 a testator could execute his will by making a mark in lieu of writing his alphabetical name. The only requirement of the statute was that the testator sign his will at the end thereof and a mark complied with this statutory mandate if the testator's intent was that the mark constituted his signature and evidenced his assent to the will.

Access the full text case

Essential Class Preparation Skills

  • How to Answer Your Professor's Questions
  • How to Brief a Case
  • Don't Miss Important Points of Law with BARBRI Outlines (Login Required)

Essential Class Resources

  • CivPro
  • Contracts
  • Constitutional Law
  • Corporations /Business Organizations
  • Criminal Law
  • Criminal Procedure/Investigation
  • Evidence
  • Legal Ethics/Professional Responsibility
  • Property
  • Secured Transactions
  • Torts
  • Trusts & Estates