Authored by Clare Parsons, Associate and Anthony Forsyth, Consultant, Corrs Chambers Westgarth. Updated by the LexisNexis Legal Writer team. What is sham contracting? “Sham contracting”...
Authored by the LexisNexis Legal Writer team. Liability under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Primary liability If an employer fails to keep records or provide pay slips as required under ss 535–536...
Authored by Leanne Dorricott, Senior Associate and Lauren Mooney, Paralegal, Corrs Chambers Westgarth. Updated by the LexisNexis Legal Writer team. An introduction to further general protections Part...
Authored by Anthony Forsyth, Consultant, Corrs Chambers Westgarth. Updated by the LexisNexis Legal Writer team. The “general protections” provisions in Pt 3-1 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth...
Authored by the Lexis Nexis Legal Writer team and updated by Erin Lynch, Partner, Grace Gunn, Senior Associate, and Jessica Smith, Lawyer, Gadens. Managing conduct Best practice employers will take...
Written by the LexisNexis Legal Writer Team In circumstances of alleged employee misconduct, it is important that an employer has evidence indicating the decision to discipline or dismiss was valid and...
Authored by Nick Le Mare, Partner, and Melody Martin, Associate, Corrs Chambers Westgarth. Updated by the LexisNexis Legal Writer team.
Division 3 of Pt 3-1 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) provides wide-ranging protection against “adverse action” for persons who exercise, or have the capacity to exercise, “workplace rights”.
Specifically, s 340(1) of the FW Act provides that a person must not take adverse action against another person:
Section 340(2) of the FW Act provides that a person must not take adverse action against another person (referred to as the "second person") because a third person has exercised, or proposes to exercise, a workplace right for the second person's benefit, or for the benefit of a class of persons to which the second person belongs.
This provision seeks to protect people from adverse action where a third party, such as a union or lawyer, has represented the person in the exercise of their workplace rights. This would, eg, cover a situation where a union obtained an order from the Fair Work Commission (FWC) for the benefit of a particular class of employees, and the employer then took adverse action against any of the employees within the class by reason of the fact that the union had obtained the order.
To view the full version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.