Each jurisdiction has one or more standard form contracts that are widely used by lawyers, conveyancers and/or real estate agents and which are published by the law society, real estate institute and conveyancing...
The contract for sale is the primary document entered into by a vendor and a purchaser. It is a legally binding agreement under which the vendor agrees to sell, and the purchaser agrees to purchase, a...
The sale of land ultimately involves passing title from the vendor to the purchaser. However, it is important that the parties, and the resulting contract, are clear on what is physically being transferred...
The Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 (Cth) (the Act) imposes limits on foreign ownership of Australian real estate. It is supplemented by the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Regulation 2015...
Contracts for the sale and purchase of land must be in writing, and executed by all parties, although equity may enforce oral contracts under the doctrine of part performance. (s 54A, Conveyancing Act...
Introduction What are the benefits of e-conveyancing over paper-based conveyancing? Electronic conveyancing (or e-conveyancing) benefits legal practitioners and the relevant parties in a number of...
Subject to mandatory vendor disclosure obligations (see Overview — Vendor disclosures), any implied warranties or warranties included in contracts of sale, and the law relating to misrepresentations or misleading or deceptive conduct (and similar vitiating factors), purchasers still typically acquire property on a caveat emptor, or buyer beware, basis. Even in those jurisdictions that have mandatory vendor disclosures or implied or standard vendor warranties, those do not cover all potential matters of importance to a purchaser.
Authored by Dr Stephen Pallavicini, Lead Property Lawyer, Marie Boustani, Property Lawyer, Woolworths Group Ltd and Sara Hatcher, Consulting Principal, Keypoint Law (NSW); Lisa Gaddie, Partner, Lander & Rogers (Vic); Luckbir Singh, Partner, MacDonnells Law, Despina Priala, Priala Legal and Simon LaBlack, Director, LaBlack Lawyers (Qld); Gary Thomas, Special Counsel and Anthony Davis, Director, McWilliams Lawyers (WA); Philip Page, Retired Partner, Mellor Olsson and Constantine Costi, Principal, Costi & Co Commercial Lawyers (SA); Tim Tierney, Principal and Sebastian Thomas-Wilson, Principal, Tierney Law (Tas); Tony Morgan, Partner and Andrew Giles, Senior Associate, HWL Ebsworth; Lyn Bennett, Consultant, Minter Ellison and Leon Loganathan, Managing Partner, Ward Keller (NT); Christine Murray, Managing Partner and Stephanie Lynch, Partner, Meyer Vandenberg Lawyers and Duncan Webber, Partner, Moray & Agnew (ACT). Updated by the LexisNexis Legal Writer team.
Purchaser due diligence is therefore important to:
Due diligence can be time consuming and costly (depending on the scope), meaning purchasers may want to delay it until they have substantially progressed negotiations or already exchanged contracts. However, late due diligence may mean the purchaser has limited options if an issue is identified.
The main benefit of conducting due diligence at the beginning is the early identification of issues, enabling the parties to address them before they become a problem. Early identification can help:
To view the full version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.