Harvard University’s tax-exempt status has been questioned by the Trump Administration—with Harvard responding that there is no legal basis for a revocation. The Administration’s action...
Many states are implementing energy benchmarking programs to track and identify energy use in buildings. These programs aim to encourage energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Check out...
When engaging in M&A discussions, parties should prioritize rigorous confidentiality measures to protect sensitive business information. Our new confidentiality agreement playbook offers valuable insights...
This practice note discusses Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) within the United States, including their purpose, history, and regulatory framework. The note is a valuable resource for advising life sciences...
Do you need guidance on tipped employee requirements under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)? Read our newly published checklist, Tipped Employees Checklist (FLSA) , for helpful information. Read now...
In Hughes v. Northwestern University, much was expected, and little delivered. Hughes was an "excessive fee" lawsuit for which the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in December 2021 and delivered a January 2022 opinion. Hughes v. Northwestern Univ., 2022 U.S. LEXIS 622 (Jan. 24, 2022), rev’g Divane v. Northwestern Univ., 953 F.3d 980 (7th Cir. 2020). The Court ultimately vacated the Seventh Circuit’s decision to permit dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. Proc 12(b)(6), directing the lower court to reevaluate the allegations as a whole, considering whether petitioners (participants) had plausibly alleged a violation of the ERISA duty of prudence, as articulated in Tibble v. Edison Int'l, 575 U.S. 523 (2015), applying the pleading standards discussed in earlier decisions.
READ NOW »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates
Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+