Litigation involving prospective solar farm developments isn’t new—especially as solar projects get smaller and move to the community and local level. But litigation claims and tactics in those...
For tax practitioners, understanding tariffs is one of the keys to unlocking the complexities of international trade. Tariffs not only shape the cost structure of imported goods but also ripple through...
Lenders typically underwrite commercial real estate loans based on the borrower’s creditworthiness and the collateral real property’s value. To mitigate the risk of a loan not being paid, lenders...
A wrong pockets clause is a covenant in acquisition agreements used to ensure that funds/receivables, rights or other assets, or liabilities that are discovered or received by one party after closing,...
See this practice note for a discussion of adverse drug event reporting responsibilities in the pharmaceutical industry. The note provides guidance on creating a framework for compliance with U.S. Food...
Unless you’ve been practicing under a rock, you’ve probably heard that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently issued a final rule banning most employee non-compete clauses. You may even have heard that there’s an exemption for non-competes with sellers of a business. But did you know that even compensation clawbacks could be deemed to be a “non-compete clause” under the FTC’s final rule, or that the business sale exemption may only extend to sellers and not to target management or key employees? Learn more about these questions and what the FTC’s rule means for M&A practice in this new article from Practical Guidance.
Read now »
Related Content
Practical Guidance UpdatesFeaturing the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE CUSTOMER EMAIL EDITION ON THE WEB
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+