Under Chair Paul Atkins, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is undergoing a philosophical and operational shift, marked by a retreat from aggressive enforcement, a rollback of prior rulemakings...
The Branch Profits Tax (BPT) under I.R.C. Section 884, is a U.S. federal income tax levied on foreign corporations that conduct business through branches located within the United States. Its purpose is...
Are there any state-specific requirements for the form, recordation, or execution of a commercial lease or memorandum of lease? Is a mechanic's lien enforceable against a landlord if the work was performed...
Introducing deeper drafting notes and more related content in the asset purchase agreement template optimized for buyers. This template now integrates key insights from the 2025 SRS Acquiom M&A Deal...
Quickly identify relevant state clinical trial laws about clinical trial coverage, populations, access, and informed consent and confidentiality. Read now » Related Content Institutional...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
When a buyer in a private acquisition transaction knows (whether at signing or before closing) that a representation or warranty given by the seller is not true yet closes the transaction anyway and then seeks damages for breach of representation or warranty, the buyer is said to have "sandbagged" the seller. On its face, such a claim might seem unfair to a seller, and even the name "sandbagging" suggests an inherent unfairness to this practice. However, there are many practical considerations with respect to risk allocation and expediting contract negotiations that might justify allowing the buyer to sandbag the seller post-closing. While some acquisition agreements attempt to explicitly preserve the opportunity of the buyer to do so by including a pro-sandbagging clause or explicitly deny such opportunity using an anti-sandbagging clause, many acquisition agreements are silent on the topic. Check out the market trends with respect to sandbagging provisions in M&A agreements publicly filed in 2023 and access representative examples in Market Standards.
Read now »
Related Content
Practical Guidance UpdatesFeaturing the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE CUSTOMER EMAIL EDITION ON THE WEB
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+