Europe is highly dependent on Russian natural gas to generate electricity and provide heat. As Russia’s invasion of Ukraine continues to drag on, and the NordStream pipeline has largely been placed...
With more than $4 trillion of tax increases scheduled to take effect at the end of 2025, given the sunsetting provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), 2025 will be the most consequential year for...
A disaster management and emergency response plan is essential for commercial real property owners, landlords, managers, and governing bodies. Read this guidance on preparing and responding to disasters...
Between the Treasury Department’s release of the highly anticipated draft outbound investment regulations to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)’s annual report...
Do you need to understand the legal requirements and procedures for filing a Representation Management (RM) Petition and best practices for addressing the National Labor Relations Board's recently...
On July 27, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its decision in Drazen v. Pinto, No. 21-10199, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 20766 (11th Cir. July 27, 2022), confirming for the first time that absent putative class members must have Article III standing. Check out this article for expert insights on this decision’s potentially broad, sweeping implications for not only Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) class actions but any class action where Article III standing is called into question and circuit splits exist.
READ NOW »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+