Under Chair Paul Atkins, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is undergoing a philosophical and operational shift, marked by a retreat from aggressive enforcement, a rollback of prior rulemakings...
The Branch Profits Tax (BPT) under I.R.C. Section 884, is a U.S. federal income tax levied on foreign corporations that conduct business through branches located within the United States. Its purpose is...
Are there any state-specific requirements for the form, recordation, or execution of a commercial lease or memorandum of lease? Is a mechanic's lien enforceable against a landlord if the work was performed...
Introducing deeper drafting notes and more related content in the asset purchase agreement template optimized for buyers. This template now integrates key insights from the 2025 SRS Acquiom M&A Deal...
Quickly identify relevant state clinical trial laws about clinical trial coverage, populations, access, and informed consent and confidentiality. Read now » Related Content Institutional...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
On July 27, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its decision in Drazen v. Pinto, No. 21-10199, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 20766 (11th Cir. July 27, 2022), confirming for the first time that absent putative class members must have Article III standing. Check out this article for expert insights on this decision’s potentially broad, sweeping implications for not only Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) class actions but any class action where Article III standing is called into question and circuit splits exist.
READ NOW »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+