The One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1), recently passed by the U.S. House, introduces major changes to the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) regime that could impact multinational corporations...
Class B malls have struggled in recent years with the decrease in mall shoppers and the departure of anchor tenants. Developers and owners are revitalizing Class B malls and filling vacancies by introducing...
Joint ventures bring together two or more parties to collaborate on a specific business opportunity. They may be structured as contractual arrangements, new entity formations, or investments in an existing...
This practice note covers how to respond to a complete response letter issued by the FDA as part of the agency’s new drug application (NDA) or biologics license application (BLA) process. Read...
Want to know how to balance the benefits of artificial intelligence tools against associated risks to employee privacy? Read our practice note, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Employee Privacy , by Damon...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
A Missouri jury recently found that defendants National Association of Realtors (NAR) and a group of real estate brokerages were guilty of conspiring to inflate real estate broker commissions in violation of the antitrust laws and awarded damages of $1.785 billion to the plaintiff home buyers. Read this article focusing on important takeaways of that verdict as well as a 2020 settlement that the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice reached with NAR, regarding similar issues, which was subsequently withdrawn in 2021.
Read now »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE CUSTOMER EMAIL EDITION ON THE WEB
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+