Succession planning is a critical aspect of managing small, closely held businesses, as the unexpected departure of a key leader can significantly disrupt operations and challenge the business's legal...
Entering into a letter of intent for an office lease agreement? Consult our playbook for valuable key provisions, alternative language provisions, and guidance for both landlords and tenants. Download...
In the complex world of M&A transactions, transition services agreements (TSAs) serve as critical bridges between deal closing and operational independence thus creating stability during organizational...
This practice note covers key legal and regulatory issues to evaluate, questions to ask, and documents to review in medical device or diagnostic technology deals, including M&A, investments, financings...
Dive into a comprehensive guide on the legal framework and strategic considerations for filing or opposing motions to exclude evidence, emphasizing the importance of understanding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) regulations and relevant case law. This practice note discusses key grounds for exclusion, such as authenticity, hearsay, and relevance, and highlights the procedural steps involved in inter partes review (IPR), from petition filing to final written decision. It also underscores the strategic value of motions to exclude, despite their low success rate, to challenge the admissibility of evidence and preserve objections for potential appeal. The note offers best practices for effectively navigating these motions, including focusing on critical evidence, adhering to deadlines, and preparing thorough legal arguments.
Read now »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE CUSTOMER EMAIL EDITION ON THE WEB
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.