The One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1), recently passed by the U.S. House, introduces major changes to the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) regime that could impact multinational corporations...
Class B malls have struggled in recent years with the decrease in mall shoppers and the departure of anchor tenants. Developers and owners are revitalizing Class B malls and filling vacancies by introducing...
Joint ventures bring together two or more parties to collaborate on a specific business opportunity. They may be structured as contractual arrangements, new entity formations, or investments in an existing...
This practice note covers how to respond to a complete response letter issued by the FDA as part of the agency’s new drug application (NDA) or biologics license application (BLA) process. Read...
Want to know how to balance the benefits of artificial intelligence tools against associated risks to employee privacy? Read our practice note, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Employee Privacy , by Damon...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in overruling its prior Chevron decision, seems to allow lower courts to independently evaluate statutory text. Many regulations, promulgated by agencies like the IRS and the DOL, have previously been upheld using the deferential framework of Chevron. What if their regulations are challenged in courts under this new framework? Will court decisions have national application or might plan sponsors have to comply with a patchwork of different statutory interpretations depending on a particular court's jurisdiction?
Read now»
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
PRACTICAL GUIDANCE CUSTOMER EMAIL EDITION ON THE WEB
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+