Under Chair Paul Atkins, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is undergoing a philosophical and operational shift, marked by a retreat from aggressive enforcement, a rollback of prior rulemakings...
The Branch Profits Tax (BPT) under I.R.C. Section 884, is a U.S. federal income tax levied on foreign corporations that conduct business through branches located within the United States. Its purpose is...
Are there any state-specific requirements for the form, recordation, or execution of a commercial lease or memorandum of lease? Is a mechanic's lien enforceable against a landlord if the work was performed...
Introducing deeper drafting notes and more related content in the asset purchase agreement template optimized for buyers. This template now integrates key insights from the 2025 SRS Acquiom M&A Deal...
Quickly identify relevant state clinical trial laws about clinical trial coverage, populations, access, and informed consent and confidentiality. Read now » Related Content Institutional...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
Several cases are percolating in 2022 that spotlight ERISA. Among them, Hughes v. Northwestern University, on which SCOTUS heard oral arguments in early December, and which focuses light on the pleading standards required to challenge retirement savings plans. See Oral arguments transcript. SCOTUS also has been asked to review Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v. California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program. That program, already representing 11,000 employers and having combined assets over $85M, requires a portion of California workers' earnings to be automatically deposited into IRAs, where the employer does not otherwise maintain a retirement savings program for those workers. And in Belknap v. Partners Healthcare System, Inc., a Massachusetts district court will consider a challenge to the mortality tables that the defined benefit plan of a large Massachusetts healthcare employer has relied on in calculating annuity payments, or their actuarial equivalents. Will reasonableness matter?
READ NOW »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates
Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+