Summary of Sections Real Market Data in Enhanced M&A Templates at Your Fingertips Addressing the Competitive Landscape Rollout Conclusion M&A practitioners know that drafting...
LexisNexis® Practical Guidance continues to empower legal professionals with fresh, actionable insights and resources. The July 2025 update delivers a wide range of new legal tools, regulatory trackers...
LexisNexis has once again raised the bar for legal practitioners with a robust suite of new resources and tools in its Practical Guidance platform. The June 2025 updates span multiple practice areas, delivering...
Public Law No. 119-21, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), represents the most comprehensive overhaul of the federal tax system since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA). Enacted on July 4, 2025...
Restaurant leasing presents a unique blend of legal considerations, shaped by operational realities such as equipment needs, utility demands, and customer-facing enhancements. Review this checklist for...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
Several cases are percolating in 2022 that spotlight ERISA. Among them, Hughes v. Northwestern University, on which SCOTUS heard oral arguments in early December, and which focuses light on the pleading standards required to challenge retirement savings plans. See Oral arguments transcript. SCOTUS also has been asked to review Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v. California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program. That program, already representing 11,000 employers and having combined assets over $85M, requires a portion of California workers' earnings to be automatically deposited into IRAs, where the employer does not otherwise maintain a retirement savings program for those workers. And in Belknap v. Partners Healthcare System, Inc., a Massachusetts district court will consider a challenge to the mortality tables that the defined benefit plan of a large Massachusetts healthcare employer has relied on in calculating annuity payments, or their actuarial equivalents. Will reasonableness matter?
READ NOW »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates
Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+