Succession planning is a critical aspect of managing small, closely held businesses, as the unexpected departure of a key leader can significantly disrupt operations and challenge the business's legal...
Entering into a letter of intent for an office lease agreement? Consult our playbook for valuable key provisions, alternative language provisions, and guidance for both landlords and tenants. Download...
In the complex world of M&A transactions, transition services agreements (TSAs) serve as critical bridges between deal closing and operational independence thus creating stability during organizational...
This practice note covers key legal and regulatory issues to evaluate, questions to ask, and documents to review in medical device or diagnostic technology deals, including M&A, investments, financings...
Several cases are percolating in 2022 that spotlight ERISA. Among them, Hughes v. Northwestern University, on which SCOTUS heard oral arguments in early December, and which focuses light on the pleading standards required to challenge retirement savings plans. See Oral arguments transcript. SCOTUS also has been asked to review Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v. California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program. That program, already representing 11,000 employers and having combined assets over $85M, requires a portion of California workers' earnings to be automatically deposited into IRAs, where the employer does not otherwise maintain a retirement savings program for those workers. And in Belknap v. Partners Healthcare System, Inc., a Massachusetts district court will consider a challenge to the mortality tables that the defined benefit plan of a large Massachusetts healthcare employer has relied on in calculating annuity payments, or their actuarial equivalents. Will reasonableness matter?
READ NOW »
Related Content
Practical Guidance Updates
Featuring the latest updates from your Practical Guidance account.
Experience results today with practical guidance, legal research, and data-driven insights—all in one place.Experience Lexis+
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.