On June 15, 2026, the Supreme Court of Florida established a statewide requirement that a signer of a litigation filing represent that the referenced legal authorities truly exist and are accurately cited...
Legal professionals routinely work with information spread across dozens, or even hundreds, of documents. Whether conducting due diligence, reviewing evidence, or supporting a regulatory investigation...
A Simpler, More Connected Lexis+® with Protégé™ Experience Legal work rarely happens one task at a time. Research leads to drafting. Drafting surfaces new research questions....
Most legal professionals have now incorporated AI-powered legal research and document summarization into their daily practices, yet docket research, a foundational task for litigators, corporate counsel...
In today’s fast-moving legal and business environment, the difference between a good decision and a great one often comes down to insight. Whether you’re preparing for litigation, exploring...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
On June 15, 2026, the Supreme Court of Florida established a statewide requirement that a signer of a litigation filing represent that the referenced legal authorities truly exist and are accurately cited within the submitted document. See Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.515; In re Amends. to Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.515, No. SC2026-0673, slip op. at 1–3 (Fla. May 28, 2026).
The proliferation of AI technologies also coincides with a dramatic increase in civil case filings in Miami-Dade, where annual filings increased from 21,408 in 2023 to 29,150 in 2025, approximately 36%.
Miami-Dade Circuit and County Civil filings increased approximately 36% from 2023 to 2025. The 2026 count is year-to-date through September 18.
Tracking Miami Dade litigation trends helps legal professionals connect that activity with risk assessment and case strategy, and it is now made easy via Lex Machina®, the LexisNexis® Legal Analytics® platform. Lex Machina now provides advanced analytics and direct document access for commercially relevant Miami-Dade Circuit Civil and County Civil lawsuits filed since 2016, covering more than 577,000 cases. New cases, trial outcomes, and procedural milestones are added daily as litigation progresses.
The expansion covers cases on condominium law, contracts, employment, insurance, medical malpractice, product liability, real property, vehicle torts, and other civil disputes. Filters for case types, party industry codes, and procedural milestones help customers focus on cases and sectors like their own.
For example, customers can filter cases by Collections, County Civil (alleged damages exceeding $8,000 but not more than $50,000, exclusive of interest, costs, and attorney fees), and Circuit Civil (alleged damages exceeding $50,000).
Related Post: Why California Rule of Court 3.400 (CRC 3.4) Filings Are Rising in Los Angeles Superior Court
The expansion’s detailed analytics for more than 4,660 civil trials show prevailing parties, damages awarded, and trial judges’ rulings. These details help legal and risk professionals examine the results that matter to a particular dispute.
For an insurer reviewing a claim for premises liability, property insurance coverage, or other dispute, comparable trial outcomes can help frame settlement discussions. Counsel can review relevant results and consult underlying filings to identify factual or procedural differences.
Examine trial resolutions for comparable Miami-Dade cases, then consult related damages information and supporting filings.
Lex Machina enables customers to analyze cases handled by attorneys and law firms to assess their experience representing parties and litigating comparable Miami-Dade disputes.
A healthcare facility can examine local counsel experience on medical malpractice matters. A condominium association can investigate firms that have handled disputes involving similar issues.
Those records make counsel interviews more specific. What role did the proposed team play? Which matters reached trial? How does that experience apply to the current dispute?
Counsel can examine how relevant Miami-Dade lawsuits progressed and use that context to discuss expected duration, staffing, and legal budgets.
Compare Miami-Dade case timing and procedural milestones to support litigation budgets and resource planning.
For a business, this can mean planning when employees, records, and outside counsel may be needed. Historical timing provides a starting point for those discussions, not a fixed schedule for a new lawsuit.
The answer depends on the sector and case category. County civil lawsuits in Miami-Dade (i.e., alleging principal damages of more than $8,000 but less than $50,000) have climbed each year since 2022. Although circuit civil division cases (alleging damages of more than $50,000) have remained remarkably flat in terms of annual volume since 2020, data shows that some varieties of these larger disputes have been increasing for businesses, while others have declined.
For disputes involving business transactions, for example, filings increased from 294 in 2020 to 382 in 2025, approximately 30%.
Insurance coverage disputes followed a different pattern, where filings fell from 4,010 in 2021 to 827 in 2025, approximately 79%, with a temporary increase in 2024.
Customers can examine Miami Dade litigation trends directly in Lex Machina. Simply select relevant case types and terms, compare milestones and outcomes, then investigate the cases behind the charts. The result is an analysis focused on truly relevant precedents.
Related Post: Seattle Litigation Trends in 2025–2026
Relevant experience makes a pitch stronger. Timely awareness creates the opportunity to deliver it.
Customers can set automatic email alerts for new Miami-Dade lawsuits and use trackers to receive updates to existing matters. That gives business development teams a way to follow litigation activity between research sessions. A business development professional can bring a new filing to the attorney best positioned to respond, connecting early awareness with relevant experience.
The proposal can connect the firm’s Miami-Dade experience with the new allegations, relevant timing benchmarks, and comparable outcomes. Instead of sending a generic credentials package, counsel can explain what the lawsuit involves and why the team’s experience fits.
Trackers support the continuing conversation. An update in an existing matter can prompt further research, a client briefing, or a discussion about new litigation needs.
“Access to reliable litigation data has always been the difference between guessing and knowing, and Miami-Dade's volume and complexity make that gap especially costly to ignore,” said Ryan Hasting, a legal data expert for Lex Machina as well as an experienced litigator in South Florida. “Analytics from Lex Machina give litigators a sharper view of how cases actually play out and the insight to strategize accordingly, while giving insurers, businesses, and other non-legal professionals the ability to assess risk and plan with confidence.”
Miami-Dade litigation analytics and document access support different professional priorities:
See how Lex Machina supports Miami-Dade litigation strategy, counsel evaluation, and risk assessment. Request a demonstration today.
It depends on the category. County civil lawsuits in Miami-Dade have climbed each year since 2022. For circuit civil cases, recent trends differ based on the variety of dispute. For example, business-transactions cases increased from 294 filings in 2020 to 382 in 2025, while insurance coverage disputes declined from 4,010 in 2021 to 827 in 2025. These examples show why businesses should examine relevant disputes rather than assume all Miami-Dade litigation follows the same trend.
Lex Machina provides advanced analytics and direct access to filings for commercially relevant Miami-Dade civil cases filed since 2016. Researchers can examine timing, trial outcomes, and counsel experience, then review relevant pleadings, briefs, and rulings. Those documents offer examples of how comparable disputes were presented and decided.
New cases, trial outcomes, and procedural milestones are added daily as litigation progresses. Customers can revisit comparable matters before budget reviews, client meetings, or settlement discussions. Automatic new-lawsuit alerts and existing-matter trackers help teams follow developments between research sessions and identify when a fresh assessment may be useful.