By Tony Muljadi | VP of Large Law, LexisNexis As LexisNexis deepens its investment in innovative legal technology, our strategic alliance with Harvey has sparked plenty of thoughtful questions from our...
AI-generated false information represents one of the most significant risks facing all working professionals today. However, unlike other fields where minor inaccuracies might be inconvenient, legal research...
By Jeff Jenkins | Chief Information Security Officer, LexisNexis Legal & Professional Summary How LexisNexis is Upholding AI Security and Privacy in Law The Gold Standard of Security and...
In-house counsel that operate with a small team, or perhaps even as a one-person legal department, are all too familiar with the daily juggling act between corporate governance, contract drafting, employment...
In-house counsel are caught up in a transformational wave, fueled by rapid innovations in AI, that could reshape the way they deliver legal services to their internal clients and manage work in partnership...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
By Madison Johnson | LexisNexis
2024 was the year of experiments and pilots with legal tech. As we look ahead, 2025 is shaping up to be the year where use cases are actioned and AI goes mainstream. To help make sense of it all, we asked seven legal experts in our network for their thoughts on legal tech trends this year (download the full publication here). In today’s blog, I explore several predictions and insights raised in this white paper.
Paul Hogg from Herbert Smith Freehills explores the evolution of legal tech beyond efficiency, focusing on user experience and the consolidation of tech stacks. He suggests that firms will increasingly engage in comparative experimentation to assess the benefits of versatile AI-enabled tools.
Christian Matarese and Thor Alden from Dechert LLP address the vanishing legal task, where AI agents are poised to handle routine tasks, allowing lawyers to focus on judgment-based work. They discuss how this raises questions about ownership, credit and the role of human oversight in AI-driven processes.
David Hobbie from Goodwin Procter LLP highlights the challenges and opportunities of adopting generative AI in the legal industry. While lawyers are traditionally risk-averse, the language-based nature of AI prompts aligns well with their skills, offering potential for significant advancements in legal workflows.
Download the full report here to read more about what trends they see, what they believe legal tech should achieve, and where firms should focus their time and money.