TRAC, Apr. 2024 "At the end of March 2024, 3,524,051 active cases were pending before the Immigration Court."
Sanchez-Perez v. Garland "One day after he pleaded guilty to violating a Tennessee domestic-violence law, the federal government initiated removal proceedings against Jose Yanel Sanchez-Perez. Ultimately...
In a letter dated April 12, 2024 the State Department and USCIS discuss "concerns about biometrics collection for applicants for T nonimmigrant status and petitioners for U nonimmigrant status abroad...
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 84 / Tuesday, April 30, 2024 "This final rule adopts and replaces regulations relating to key aspects of the placement, care, and services provided to unaccompanied...
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas Issue: Whether a visa petitioner may obtain judicial review when an approved petition is revoked on the basis of nondiscretionary criteria. Case below: 75 F.4th 1157 (11th Cir....
ACLU, Jan. 19, 2023
"In a three-day trial set to begin January 24 in Teller County District Court in Cripple Creek, Colorado, ACLU of Colorado lawyers will argue that Sheriff Jason Mikesell violates a Colorado statute and the Colorado Constitution by enforcing federal immigration law pursuant to an agreement with ICE.
This is the first trial in the country in a lawsuit alleging that a sheriff violates state law by participating in a 287(g) agreement with ICE.
Under the agreement, Teller County deputies receive training from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which then authorizes them to make immigration arrests and exercise other immigration-enforcement powers ordinarily reserved to federal officers. This is the only 287(g) agreement still operating in Colorado.
Representing six Teller County taxpayers, ACLU of Colorado lawyers filed the lawsuit in 2019, shortly after Colorado enacted a statute that expressly forbids law enforcement officers from arresting or detaining persons on the basis of ICE documents that are not signed by a judge.
In 2020, the district court ruled that the taxpayers did not have legal standing to bring the lawsuit. In 2022, the Court of Appeals reversed and sent the case back to the district court for trial.
At trial, the ACLU will present evidence that under the 287(g) program, persons who posted bond were not released, as Colorado law requires, but instead remained imprisoned and were turned over to ICE.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys in the trial court are Mark Silverstein, Annie Kurtz, and Sara Neel of the ACLU of Colorado and Byeongsook Seo, ACLU Cooperating Attorney, of Snell and Wilmer.
WHEN: Tuesday, January 24, 2023, at 9:00 AM MT
WHERE: Teller County Courthouse 101 W. Bennett Avenue Cripple Creek, CO 80813
RESOURCES: Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment: https://www.aclu-co.org/sites/default/files/2022-12-30_nash_v._mikesell_msj_final.pdf ACLU of Colorado 2019 Complaint: https://www.aclu-co.org/sites/default/files/2019-06-27-Complaint-Nash-v.-Mikesell-Teller287g.pdf"