Campos-Chavez v. Garland No. 22–674, 54 F. 4th 314, affirmed; No. 22–884, 24 F. 4th 1315, reversed (Mendez- Colín) and vacated and remanded (Singh). ALITO, J., delivered the opinion...
Hats off to Ana Maria Portela (Arocha) for scoring this victory on June 5, 2024!
USCIS, June 12, 2024 "USCIS is issuing guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual that interprets that the confidentiality protections under 8 U.S.C. 1367 end at naturalization, which will allow naturalized...
Visa Bulletin for July 2024 Notes D & E: D. RETROGRESSION IN THE EMPLOYMENT-BASED THIRD (EB-3) PREFERENCE CATEGORY As readers were informed was possible in Item D of the June 2024 Visa Bulletin...
DoD, USCIS, July 223 "This memorandum of understanding (MOU) and relevant appendices constitutes an agreement between the Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS), acting...
Pioneers Memorial Healthcare, Dec. 23, 2015- "In August 2015, the Employer filed two motions requesting that the Board reopen and remand the appeal. The Employer explained that after its appeal was withdrawn the Department of Labor changed its position on cases involving Section K and non-experience qualifications. OFLC stated that it would reverse denials that were based on a missing non-experience qualification if that was the sole reason the case had been denied. The Employer also included an email from the Senior Trial Attorney with the Office of the Solicitor stating that the CO would not object to a request to reopen. The Board has previously looked to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) for guidance on reopening matters. See Intel Corporation, 2013-PER-3071 (Feb. 20, 2014). Rule 60(b)(6) allows for relief from a final order for “any other reason that justifies relief.” This relief is reserved for extraordinary circumstances. Intel Corporation, at 5. In this case, the CO, not the Employer, asked that the case be remanded for certification and OFLC indicated its reversal of position on these types of Section K denial cases. We find that the CO’s willingness to grant certification, coupled with OFLC’s policy change, constitutes an extraordinary circumstance that allows us to grant relief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). We therefore will order the granting of certification."