Santos-Zacaria v. Garland (unpub.) ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES [598 U.S. 411 *; 143 S. Ct. 1103 **; 215 L. Ed. 2d 375 ***; 2023 U.S. LEXIS 1891 ****] Before Clement, Richman...
Akinsaya v. Garland "Rasheed Akinsanya is a Nigerian citizen. He has brought a petition for review challenging the administrative denial of his application for deferral of removal pursuant to the...
El Salvador (advance copy of FR notice here ) Venezuela Ukraine Sudan
DHS, Jan. 10, 2025 "Today, Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in consultation with Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken, designated Romania as a participating country in the Visa...
EOIR, Jan. 7, 2025 "The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) today announced it will open a new immigration court in Indianapolis on Jan. 27, 2025, to meet the growing needs of our Indiana...
"On the current record, it is clear that Ms. Rusak has established a claim of past persecution based on the abuses endured by her parents while she was a child. Nor has the government successfully proven that conditions in Belarus have changed sufficiently that Ms. Rusak no longer has a well-founded fear of persecution were she to return. Contrary to the BIA’s conclusion, the Belarus country reports contained in the Administrative Record do not indicate that the status of minority religious groups has improved in recent years. In fact, they suggest the opposite – that members of minority religions still face attack by the government. The BIA’s conclusion on this issue is unsupported by substantial evidence." - Rusak v. Holder, Aug. 22, 2013.