DOL, July 26, 2024 "On August 7, 2024, the Department of Labor will host a public webinar to educate stakeholders, program users, and other interested members of the public on the changes to the...
Atud v. Garland (unpub.) "Mathurin A. Atud petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings based on alleged ineffective...
Shen v. Garland "Peng Shen, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. An Immigration Judge ...
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/25/2024 "On January 17, 2017, DHS published a final rule with new regulatory provisions guiding the use of parole on a case...
Lance Curtright reports: "After the 5th Circuit’s initial decision in Membreno, [ Membreno-Rodriguez v. Garland, 95 F.4th 219 ] my law partner Paul Hunker (a new AILA member!) reached out to...
Andrew Free writes - "See ... today's decision from Judge John S. Bryant, a Magistrate Judge in the Middle District of Tennessee. The Court previously granted Plaintiffs' motion for a protective order regarding their immigration status and that of third-party witnesses. ICE defendants' counsel claimed it was "absurd" to force the ICE agents to leave a deposition room while such questioning took place. The Judge disagreed. The case is Nunez-Escobar v. Gaines, No. 3:11-cv-994 (M.D. Tenn. filed Oct. 19, 2011). It's being litigated by Hughes, Socol, Piers, Resnick & Dym, Ltd of Chicago, the ACLU-IRP, the ACLU of Tennessee, and Ozment Law. Our hat goes off to Andre Segura and Justin Cox at ACLU-IRP, Jenna Miara, Cara Hendrickson, and Jose Behar and Hughes Socol, and Tricia Herzfeld at Ozment Law."