American Immigration Council (Council) and the National Immigration Project, Jan. 17, 2025 "A stay of removal prevents the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from executing a final order of removal...
Texas v. USA "This is the latest chapter in the long-running litigation challenging the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, commonly known as DACA. In 2021, a district court held that...
Matter of Arciniegas-Patino Where parties were properly served with electronic notice of the briefing schedule, a representative’s failure to diligently monitor the inbox, including the spam folder...
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/17/2025 "The United States supports the human rights and fundamental freedoms of the residents of Hong Kong. The People's...
Alan Lee, Jan. 16, 2025 "USCIS’s second part of the H-1B proposed regulations, “Modernizing H-1B Requirements, Providing Flexibility in the F-1 Program, and Program Improvements Affecting...
"We also find that, while the respondent in this case has family in Mexico, her situation nevertheless is analogous to that in Matter of Recinas, supra, as she is a single mother of limited economic means who is supporting her five children, including four United States citizens, two of whom have medical conditions. Given the totality of the circumstances presented in this case, we find that the record contains sufficient evidence to establish that the respondent's removal from the United States will result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her qualifying relatives." - Matter of X-, Aug. 30, 2013.
Hats off to Janeen Hicks Pierre!