NIJC Know Your Rights: Prepare for Trump’s Mass Deportation Threats All individuals in the United States have rights, regardless of immigration status What “mass deportations”...
Todd Miller, The Border Chronicle, Dec. 12, 2024 "The prolific author and photographer describes powerful instances of worker resistance and how undocumented labor will be a serious thorn in Trump’s...
Tatyana Dandanpolie, Salon, Dec. 11, 2024 "[I]mmigration law and policy experts told Salon that Trump has no real legal pathway toward repealing birthright citizenship, despite his claims. Instead...
From the Dec. 10, 2024 Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing, How Mass Deportations Will Separate American Families, Harm Our Armed Forces, and Devastate Our Economy : - Testimony of Foday Turay - Testimony...
Muzaffar Chishti, Kathleen Bush-Joseph, Colleen Putzel-Kavanaugh, and Madeleine Greene, MPI, Dec. 10, 2024 "... This article reviews the Biden administration’s track record on immigration...
Letter from the Round Table of Former Immigration Judges, Oct. 19, 2021
Comments on Proposed Rulemaking: 86 FR 46906, Procedures for Credible Fear Screening and Consideration of Asylum
"Limitation on Immigration Judge Review: We strongly oppose the proposal to severely restrict the right of those denied asylum by USCIS to a full de novo merits hearing before an Immigration Judge. Given the significant increases in efficiency mentioned above, the proposed restrictions are unnecessary to reduce the backlog. Regardless, even if EOIR and DHS disagree with this assessment, regulations may neither contradict the Congressional intent of statutes they seek to interpret, nor deny due process in the name of efficiency. Yet the proposed rule would violate both of these principles in the changes they propose to Immigration Court procedures."
[There's more. Please read the whole thing.]