Litigation insights from Lex Machina®, the LexisNexis® Legal Analytics® platform, allow law offices to support their recommendations with data. Clients appreciate legal professionals who can...
By Chuan Qin and Adam Mills Masarek1 Los Angeles Superior Court has long served as one of the nation’s busiest and most influential trial courts. Over the last several years, however, one category...
For legal teams evaluating federal agency action, the Administrative Procedure Act, or APA, is a foundational statute. Often searched as “what is the administrative procedures act,” the APA...
Results from the Lex Machina ® 2026 Impact of Legal Analytics Survey show how deeply analytics have influenced modern litigation practice. In a survey of 207 law firm professionals in the U.S., respondents...
Commercial contract litigation arises when parties to a business agreement cannot resolve alleged breaches through negotiation or alternative dispute resolution. These disputes may involve payment disagreements...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
Results from the Lex Machina® 2026 Impact of Legal Analytics Survey show how deeply analytics have influenced modern litigation practice. In a survey of 207 law firm professionals in the U.S., respondents reported using analytics to assess litigation exposure, understand tendencies of judges and opposing counsel, strengthen motions and briefs, and demonstrate expertise to clients with greater confidence.
This year’s results also showed broad agreement on value. Across the surveyed firm segments, 100% of respondents agreed that litigation data analytics add value to their practice. That marks an increase from last year’s survey, when just over 95% of respondents agreed that analytics were valuable. Those findings build on Lex Machina’s 2025 survey insights, which described legal analytics as having moved “from important to essential.” Lex Machina 2025 Survey Insights
The 2026 survey results reveal that legal analytics adoption is no longer limited to early adopters or large firms. Growing client expectations, demands for greater efficiency, and the need for data-driven decision-making are accelerating adoption across the legal industry. The following five trends illustrate how law firms are using legal analytics to improve litigation outcomes, strengthen client relationships, and integrate intelligence more deeply into everyday workflows.
Among legal professionals at firms with 51+ attorneys, analytics have played a central role in litigation practice, with 86% of respondents in such firms reporting having used legal analytics in their litigation practice. Client expectations have moved in the same direction, as 88% agreed that clients expect analytics to be used while attorneys work on their matters.
Large-firm respondents identified successful litigation outcomes as the biggest driver of adoption. Improved efficiency has also encouraged firms to adopt analytics, along with business development needs.
For these firms, analytics have been supporting both litigation strategy and client development. Attorneys have been using litigation intelligence to evaluate judges, parties, opposing counsel, timing, damages, and outcomes. Business development teams have been using the same kind of data to sharpen pitches, demonstrate expertise, and identify new opportunities.
Analytics have been helping smaller firms compete with sharper information. A solo attorney or small team can evaluate case timing, damages patterns, judicial behavior, opposing counsel experience, and outcomes in similar matters without hiring a small army of project attorneys. Survey responses from legal professionals in firms with fewer than 51 attorneys also recognized the value of data-driven advocacy, although adoption has differed from larger firms.
Among firms with 1-50 attorneys, 44% of respondents have reported using legal analytics in their litigation practice, while 100% agreed that analytics are valuable to their practice. That gap leaves plenty of room for growth, especially as smaller firms have been facing more client pressure to bring data into their work. Among legal professionals in these firms, 55% of respondents agreed that clients expect attorneys to use analytics while handling their matters.
Respondents from smaller law firms chose successful litigation outcomes as the leading driver of adoption. Improved efficiency also ranked high. Compared with larger firms, cost savings carried more weight for smaller firms that need to be especially deliberate with time, staffing, and resources.
For leaner teams, better information can change the rhythm of a case. Analytics have been helping lawyers size up matters faster, focus limited resources more deliberately, and give clients advice grounded in patterns rather than hunches.
Those benefits often build on one another in day-to-day practice. Attorneys who assess a case earlier can spot pressure points before a matter settles into its trajectory. A clearer read on a judge’s history or an opponent’s patterns gives litigation teams more room to adjust strategy while choices still matter. With analytics in hand, lawyers have been moving past war stories and building arguments around patterns the data can support.
Experienced lawyers still bring judgment, creativity, client knowledge, and strategic instincts to a client’s cause. Analytics simply provide legal professionals with a clearer view of the “forest” of civil litigation, along with the powerful ability to zoom in on subsets of “trees” (lawsuits) that interest them. Together, those strengths give attorneys a stronger foundation for decisions about motions, settlement posture, damages exposure, litigation timelines, and trial strategy.
Related Post: Anticipate, Uncover, Deliver: Three Ways Litigation Analytics Bolster Real Workflows
The survey also showed that firms have been using analytics well before a complaint, motion, or trial date enters the picture. For firms of all sizes, the leading business use has been pitching or demonstrating expertise to clients.
That finding reflects a broader change in how firms compete. Clients want to know whether a firm has relevant experience. They also want to know whether the firm understands the terrain. Analytics help firms answer with specifics. A pitch can draw on insights about courts, judges, parties, opposing counsel, case timing, damages, or outcomes in similar disputes.
That kind of preparation gives law firm pitches and RFP responses more substance. Firms can show clients what the data suggests and explain how those insights may shape strategy, rather than leaning on broad statements about experience alone.
Litigation data analytics also support competitive intelligence for law firms. They help attorneys and marketing teams identify new opportunities, vet potential clients, spot litigation patterns, and recognize where firm experience aligns with prospects’ needs.
The 2026 survey results also show strong interest in connecting analytics with other firm information. Law firms increasingly view analytics as part of a broader decision-making ecosystem rather than as standalone resources.
Among large firms, 75% of legal professionals said they wanted to integrate legal analytics data with other information available within their firm, including through APIs. Among firms with 1-50 attorneys, seven out of ten legal professionals expressed interest in similar integrations.
Those findings build on momentum shown in last year’s survey results, in which six out of ten respondents said they were interested in integrating analytics data with other organizational information systems through APIs.
The 2026 results confirm that demand for data-informed litigation intelligence has continued to grow. Firms have been looking for lawsuit data to connect with the systems where legal work already happens, including internal knowledge tools, matter management systems, business development platforms, legal research workflows, and AI-powered solutions.
That next step matters because analytics become more useful when attorneys can access insights at the right moment. Data stuck in a forgotten system has roughly the same charm as a brilliant memo that no one opens. For many law firms, optimal value comes when data-driven litigation insights surface inside the workflows where lawyers are already researching, drafting, advising, and making strategic decisions.
Related Post: Lex Machina API Analytics for Litigation Strategy
Across firms of all sizes, legal professionals agreed that analytics improve efficiency, increase competitiveness, strengthen legal arguments, and bolster case assessment. Attorneys have been using analytics to prepare with more context, pitch with more authority, and make dispute-resolution decisions with a clearer view of prior outcomes and patterns.
As firms continue looking for ways to improve performance and deepen client trust, adoption of litigation data analytics into decision-making has become a marker of modern legal practice. Firms that embrace litigation intelligence have been positioning themselves to deliver the insight, confidence, and strategic clarity clients increasingly expect.
To find out more about Lex Machina and how it can elevate your legal decision-making and to request a demo: LexisNexis.com/LexMachina.
Every litigation matter raises important questions. LexisNexis offers solutions to help you answer them at every state of the litigation lifecycle: