The Lex Machina 2026 Patent Litigation Report shows a split-screen story: By the end of 2025, district court filings had just reached their highest level in a decade, while activity before the Patent Trial...
Litigation insights from Lex Machina®, the LexisNexis® Legal Analytics® platform, allow law offices to support their recommendations with data. Clients appreciate legal professionals who can...
By Chuan Qin and Adam Mills Masarek1 Los Angeles Superior Court has long served as one of the nation’s busiest and most influential trial courts. Over the last several years, however, one category...
For legal teams evaluating federal agency action, the Administrative Procedure Act, or APA, is a foundational statute. Often searched as “what is the administrative procedures act,” the APA...
Results from the Lex Machina ® 2026 Impact of Legal Analytics Survey show how deeply analytics have influenced modern litigation practice. In a survey of 207 law firm professionals in the U.S., respondents...
* The views expressed in externally authored materials linked or published on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of LexisNexis Legal & Professional.
New insights from Lex Machina®, the LexisNexis® Legal Analytics® platform, reveal a significant shift in San Diego Superior Court’s civil litigation landscape. While overall civil filings have risen since 2022, the increase is almost entirely attributable to a sharp uptick in limited-jurisdiction collections lawsuits, in which creditors or debt-purchasers pursue recovery of alleged debt under $35,000. In 2025, creditors filed more than 32,000 such cases, an increase of more than 65 percent compared to total filings in 2023.
Figure A: Filing Volume for Limited Jurisdiction Collections Lawsuits in San Diego Superior Court
Non-collection matters, by comparison, have remained stable. In fact, San Diego Superior Court fielded hundreds fewer non-collections lawsuits in 2025 (18,784) compared to 2024 (19,046).
Data from Lex Machina shows that only a handful of creditors and debt purchasers are responsible for most of the recent surge in lawsuits. Capital One, JPMorgan Chase Bank, Portfolio Recovery Associates, American Express National Bank, and Velocity Investments all recorded substantial year-over-year increases in San Diego filings. From 2023 to 2025, several more than doubled their recent historical averages.
Capital One, for example, filed more than 3,000 collections lawsuits in San Diego in 2025, more than doubling their total from the prior year. JPMorgan Chase increased its filings from under one thousand in 2023 to more than 2,500 in 2025. Velocity Investments continued a multi-year upward trend and reached more than 1,400 filings in 2025.
Figure B: Plaintiffs in Collections Lawsuits in San Diego Superior Court, 2021-2025
*Source: Lex Machina, Top Parties Reports for San Diego Superior Court Collections Lawsuits, 2021-2025.
The accelerating pace of debt-collection lawsuits coincides with increased internal operational capacity among creditors. Many major lenders and debt-buyers describe the use of automation and AI tools in account oversight, collection workflows, and risk modeling on their public websites. Combined with broader economic conditions such as inflation, shifting labor markets, and evolving consumer repayment trends, these capabilities may be enabling higher filing volumes for creditors.
Taken together, the data indicates a concentrated group of large lenders is filing significantly more lawsuits in San Diego. The increasing caseload in San Diego has practical implications for the parties and counsel involved in all cases before the court, and understanding those trends allows counsel to adjust their expectations and strategy recommendations accordingly.
Learn more about Lex Machina and how our platform enables data-driven insights and decisions for civil litigation.