Practical Guidance is committed to amplifying diverse voices of attorneys across all differences, including gender and race. If you are interested in writing for Practical Guidance, please let us know...
Earlier this year, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers published a final rule 1 to revise the definition of waters of the United States.
THIS ARTICLE DISCUSSES...
By: Cameron Kinvig , PRACTICAL GUIDANCE ENERGY & UTILITIES ATTORNEY EDITOR
This article provides you and your clients with an overview of the federal environmental regulation affecting the oil and...
Sustainability-Linked Loans Overview
Sustainability-linked loans are loans where the economic characteristics can vary depending on whether the borrower achieves ambitious, material, and quantifiable...
By: M. Shams Billah , BARNES & THORNBURG LLP, NEW YORK
This article discusses guidance for borrowers and private equity sponsors entering into private credit loans with nonbank lenders in the middle...
Copyright © 2023 LexisNexis and/or its Licensors.
By: Abram Ellis, John Terzaken, and Jonathan Myers, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
This article addresses the extraterritorial reach of U.S. antitrust laws—that is, their application to international trade or commerce—specifically discussing the interplay between the Sherman Act, which prohibits anticompetitive conduct, and the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act (FTAIA), which defines the Sherman Act’s extraterritorial application.
GENERALLY, THE FTAIA PROVIDES THAT THE SHERMAN ACT does not apply to purely foreign activity, but the Sherman Act could apply to partially foreign activity. This article outlines significant considerations to help you understand when U.S. antitrust law reaches foreign conduct.
Section 1 of the Sherman Act,1 declares illegal every “contract, combination . . . or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations.” Thus, by its own terms, the Sherman Act has extensive reach and would apply to any agreement that (unreasonably) restrains trade or commerce involving a foreign nation. To limit the reach of the Sherman Act, U.S. courts developed a set of guidelines to determine when, in fact, the Sherman Act reached foreign conduct.
In United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, Judge Learned Hand of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit fashioned an effects test to determine whether U.S. antitrust law applies to foreign conduct.2 Under the effects test, Judge Hand held, U.S. law would apply to foreign business activity (1) “intended to affect” U.S. commerce, and (2) “shown actually to have had some effect upon” U.S. commerce. Subsequent courts followed Judge Hand’s general guidance but disagreed significantly as to when the Sherman Act applied to foreign conduct. In response to this disagreement, Congress enacted the FTAIA in 1982.3
The FTAIA defines when U.S. antitrust law reaches foreign or international operations, purchases, and conduct. Thus, the FTAIA has special importance for companies that buy or sell goods or services outside the United States. For example, U.S. companies that purchase goods from foreign sellers may hold those sellers accountable under U.S. antitrust laws for anticompetitive practices, so whether the FTAIA bars U.S. antitrust claims would be relevant to those U.S. companies. Relatedly, foreign companies that sell goods or services knowing that those goods or services will be imported into the United States have an interest in knowing when and the extent to which U.S. law applies to those sales.
To read the full practice note in Lexis Practice Advisor, follow this link.
John Terzaken is a partner at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP focusing on antitrust matters, including government enforcement of antitrust, fraud, and other white collar violations, as well as related follow-on civil litigation. Prior to joining Simpson Thacher, John held a leading position in the DOJ’s Antitrust Division as Director of Criminal Enforcement, where he oversaw the division’s criminal enforcement nationwide. His responsibilities included presiding over some of the largest global cartel investigations ever undertaken by the DOJ. Abram Ellis is a partner at Simpson Thacher focusing on antitrust matters, including class action litigation, antitrust merger review and antitrust counseling, and on regulatory issues present in international and cross-border transactions. He regularly represents clients in some of the most high-profile, pending private antitrust actions. He has also successfully helped clients navigate the antitrust merger review process and regularly consults and advises clients on potential business activities and strategies, new industry developments, and contracting activities. Jonathan Myers is an associate in the Washington, D.C. office of Simpson Thacher.
For background on the required effect on interstate commerce for domestic conduct, see
> EFFECT ON COMMERCE IN FEDERAL ANTITRUST CASES
RESEARCH PATH: Antitrust > Civil Antitrust Litigation > Pleadings > Practice Notes
For a discussion of the issue of whether an antitrust plaintiff has standing to sue, including a discussion of the antitrust injury doctrine, see
> STANDING IN ANTITRUST CASES
For an overview of considerations related to application of the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act (FTAIA), see
> FOREIGN TRADE ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT (FTAIA) CHECKLIST
RESEARCH PATH: Antitrust > Civil Antitrust Litigation > Pleadings > Checklists
For basic information on antitrust law, see
> ANTITRUST LAW FUNDAMENTALS
RESEARCH PATH: Antitrust > Antitrust Fundamentals > Practice Notes
1. 15 U.S.C.S. § 1. 2. 148 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1945). 3. 15 U.S.C.S. § 6a.