By: Michael Furrow and Shannon Clark , Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto ...
FEDERAL COURT FAST TRACKS REVIEW OF RULING BLOCKING IMPLEMENTATION OF OVERTIME REGULATIONS
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ISSUED A BRIEF order December 8 granting expedited review of a November 22...
HHS AGENCY PROPOSES RULE TO STABILIZE INSURANCE MARKETPLACE
THE CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES (CMS) issued a proposed rule aimed at stabilizing individual and small group health insurance...
By: Eric E. Bensen.
The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) 1 creates for the first time a federal private cause of action for trade secret misappropriation. 2 Prior to the DTSA’s enactment, private...
AMENDMENTS TO NEWLY PASSED CALIFORNIA CONSUMER PRIVACY ACT SIGNED INTO LAW
By: Lexis Practice Advisor Attorney Team
GOVERNOR EDMUND G. BROWN SIGNED A BILL AMENDING the California Consumer Privacy Act...
By: Chris Kelly, Jones Day
IN RECENT YEARS, THE STAFF OF THE U.S. SECURITIES AND Exchange Commission (SEC) has undertaken an initiative to bolster capital formation, including by providing companies more flexibility to access U.S. capital markets. As a result, recent changes to law and SEC interpretations provide companies with a broad range of potential private financing opportunities that can be executed more quickly and with less expense than traditional public registered securities offerings. However, the rapidly changing legal and regulatory landscape has also introduced additional nuances and complexity to be considered in the context of these offerings.
Because the consequences of mistakes in a private placement transaction can be severe, it is important for lawyers advising companies in connection with private placements to maintain a deep understanding of evolving securities laws and their interpretations in order to guide these companies in successfully planning, implementing, and executing their private placement transactions. Below are 10 practice points that you should be mindful of in steering a private placement transaction from start to finish.
Private placements, including private investments in public equities (PIPEs), provide companies with great flexibility, allowing them to issue a variety of instruments— common or preferred equity securities, straight or convertible debt securities, warrants, units, and/or bespoke securities— tailored to meet their particular financing needs. A company considering a private placement may not be familiar with the range of securities available and may not fully appreciate how a particular security fits within its existing capital structure. As a starting point, you should discuss with the company its strategic objectives for the proposed financing within the context of its existing capital structure and, within this framework, assist the company in deciding what type of security is best suited to the company’s goals and needs.
Private placements occur within a complex and evolving regulatory framework of U.S. federal securities laws, stock exchanges’ rules, regulators’ interpretations, and companies’ own limitations under their existing capital structures. For purposes of U.S. federal securities laws, the fundamental principle is that a company may not offer or sell securities unless the transaction has been registered with the SEC or an exemption from registration is available. For a private placement to comply with the U.S. federal securities laws, there must be a valid exemption from the registration requirements available, and the terms and execution of the proposed offering and sale must comply with the requirements of that exemption. You should engage in a collaborative exercise with the issuing company to identify the exemption that is best suited to the proposed transaction from the range of available exemptions, including, among others:
In order to choose an appropriate exemption, it will be necessary to know various key facts, including the proposed size of the potential offering, identity of the potential investors (and how they will be identified), location of potential investors, whether an investment bank will be engaged to facilitate the offering and, if so, in what capacity, the nature and extent of the marketing and distribution process, and other factors.
To read the full practice note in Lexis Practice Advisor, follow this link.
Chris Kelly is a corporate lawyer with more than 30 years of experience. He represents corporations and financial institutions in diverse domestic and international corporate finance matters including public equity and debt offerings, Rule 144A high yield offerings, private capital raisings, reorganizations, restructurings, recapitalizations, and acquisition transactions. Chris, a partner at Jones Day, regularly advises SEC reporting companies on corporate governance, board of directors, securities laws, stock exchange rules, and related public company regulatory compliance matters.
For an overview of private placements, see
> PRIVATE PLACEMENTS RESOURCE KIT
RESEARCH PATH: Capital Markets & Corporate Governance > Private Offerings > Private Placements > Practice Notes
For more information on issues to consider when conducting a private placement of securities, see
> PRIVATE PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
To see a checklist of tasks to be undertaken in the closing of a private offering, see
> CLOSING CHECKLIST (PRIVATE OFFERING OF PREFERRED SHARES)
RESEARCH PATH: Capital Markets & Corporate Governance > Private Offerings > Private Placements > Checklists
To learn more about private offering exemptions, see
> PRIVATE OFFERING EXEMPTIONS