By Hon. Robert G. Rassp, author of The Lawyer’s Guide to the AMA Guides and California Workers’ Compensation (LexisNexis) Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this article...
Oakland, CA – The decline in opioid use in California workers’ compensation has outpaced the decline among the state’s overall population according to a new California Workers’...
By Julius Young, Richard Jacobsmeyer, Barry Bloom, Editors-in-Chief for Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Handbook [Note: This article is excerpted from the upcoming 2025 edition of Herlick...
By Hon. Colleen Casey, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Practitioners beware! Death benefit trials often raise intricate and unique evidentiary conundrums. Obtaining...
Oakland, CA – California’s State Average Weekly Wage (SAWW) rose nearly 3.8 percent in the year ending March 31, 2024, which will result in an increase in California workers’ compensation...
A Virginia employee could not recover workers’ compensation benefits for injuries she sustained when she fell backwards while sitting on a brick wall where she had been resting, held a state appellate court; she had failed to prove that the injury arose out of her employment. Testimony that the employee was hot and did not want to return to the enclosure where she worked, that the wall was approximately “seat height,” with a flat top about 12 inches wide, and that workers commonly sat on the wall supported her contention that the injuries occurred in the course of the employment. She had not established, however, that there was a causal connection between her work and her fall. She could not explain why she fell, said the court. Nor could she show that the fall was due to some inherent flaw or danger in the brick wall. While it was undisputed that the employee fell, the court indicated the evidence did not support the commission’s conclusion that a condition of the workplace caused the accident.
Thomas A. Robinson, J.D., the Feature National Columnist for the LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation eNewsletter, is a leading commentator and expert on the law of workers’ compensation.
LexisNexis Online Subscribers: Citations below link to Lexis Advance. Bracketed citations link to lexis.com.
See G4S Gov’t Solutions, Inc. v. McDonald, 2014 Va. App. LEXIS 390 (Nov. 25, 2014) [2014 Va. App. LEXIS 390 (Nov. 25, 2014)]
See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 7.04 [7.04]
Source: Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, the nation’s leading authority on workers’ compensation law.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site
_______________________________________________
ATTENTION: RISK MANAGERS, INSURANCE & HR PROFESSIONALS, ATTORNEYS, POLICY MAKERS
Special Discount Rate of $79.50 + tax & shipping for a limited time only
New! Workers' Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis, 2014 Edition (400 pp). Read flyer & Order today. Books expected to ship 10/24/2014.
State by State Workers' Comp Legislation for 2014. Expert analysis and commentary. Larson Spotlight on Interesting Cases.
This year's top issue: The Temporary Workforce and Impact on Workers' Compensation