Improving AI governance: What recent research reveals about productivity, trust, and AI that acts

2026-03-23T10:34:00Z

Generative AI (genAI) is used daily across industries by approximately half of working professionals.

But, according to the latest LexisNexis Future of Work research, genAI adoption is accelerating faster than organizational AI governance. The result? Excess liability and risk.

GenAI should help your organization grow—not hinder it. In this article, we’ll help you determine where your organization is on your AI development journey by exploring how organizational policies, guidance, and training are not keeping pace with AI adoption rates. We’ll close with recommended next steps for leaders.

Table of Contents:

AI and the future of work
Key finding 1: AI governance crisis
Key finding 2: Overconfidence as a risk
Key finding 3: Uneven access to AI training
AI and accountability
Next steps

AI and the future of work

As Snehit Cherian, CTO of Global Nexis Solutions, has previously noted, genAI’s most durable value lies in augmenting human effort inevitably freeing professionals to focus on higher-value, more strategic work. The Future of Work Report 2026: Generative AI—Tool, Colleague, or Liability, confirms his point, while also revealing where gaps in oversight, confidence, and trust threaten to undermine it.

According to our research, genAI is already deeply embedded in professional workflows. Roughly half of professionals report using genAI frequently, and usage spans everything from basic assistance to full task execution.

Yet while adoption has surged, governance and readiness have not kept pace. The result is a widening disconnect between leadership perception and operational reality, potentially exposing organizations to legal, security, and reputational risk.

This year’s findings point to three critical themes shaping the future of work:

A growing governance crisis driven by shadow AI
Rising overconfidence that masks real risk
Training progress that builds confidence but leaves access uneven

Download the Full Report

Key finding 1: The AI governance crisis is leadership’s biggest blind spot

GenAI adoption is happening with or without formal approval. While leaders may believe policies and controls are in place, the data tells a more sobering story.

More than half of professionals surveyed(53%)report using genAI tools without formal approval. Nearly one-third (28%) say their organization has no genAI policy at all, and 42% aren’t even sure whether one exists. Meanwhile, 55% pay for their own AI tools, with the majority using them for work purposes.

This is the reality of shadow AI: Employees solving real problems with whatever tools are available, often outside approved systems and safeguards.

The governance gap is largely caused by misalignment. Teams are moving faster than the infrastructure designed to support them, creating exposure leaders may not see until something goes wrong.

AI productivity gains are real but fragile

There’s no question genAI is delivering productivity gains. Professionals increasingly treat AI models as more than simple tools. Nearly 40% now view genAI as a collaborator or partner, and 16% rely on it to take over entire tasks. These shifts reflect deeper integration into workflows and real efficiency benefits.

This aligns with earlier leadership perspectives emphasizing genAI as a “supportive co-worker” rather than a replacement. But the data also shows that productivity gains are fragile when they’re built on ungoverned usage.

Key finding 2: Organizations are ready in theory, but exposed in practice

One of the most striking findings in the 2026 report is the gap between confidence and comprehension.

Nearly 64% of professionals say they are very or extremely confident using AI responsibly. On the surface, this looks like progress. In practice, it introduces a new category of risk.

Many professionals admit they don’t fully understand:

Where AI outputs come from

How conclusions are generated

When AI should not be used

More than a third say they are least confident in understanding AI data sources, and another third struggle to know when AI is inappropriate for a task. At the same time, employees increasingly trust AI outputs enough to use them in higher-stakes deliverables, often without consistent validation.

The combination of high confidence, low visibility, and expanding use creates a liability blind spot. Trust that begins as appropriate for brainstorming or drafting can quietly extend into decisions with legal, financial, or reputational consequences.

When AI moves from assisting to acting

The stakes rise further as AI evolves from supporting tasks to initiating actions.

More than half of professionals say their organization has launched internal AI agents, yet only 44% clearly understand what those agents are. A quarter report minimal or poor understanding, and some don’t know whether agents are in use at all.

Despite this, most professionals still expect human involvement:

65% say human validation is very or extremely important

56% believe humans should remain involved at every stage

Only 9% support minimal human oversight

Increasing autonomy and limited understanding underscores why governance frameworks designed for assistive AI are no longer enough. As systems begin to act, accountability, explainability, and oversight must be designed in from the start.

The 2026 data makes it clear that experimentation without validation introduces significant risk and that governance must be designed alongside adoption.

Key finding 3: AI training builds confidence, but access remains uneven

Training coverage has improved meaningfully. 82% of professionals now receive some form of AI training, up from 72% the previous year. Training correlates strongly with confidence: nearly 80% of those with mandatory training report being very or extremely confident using AI.

But training alone is not enough, and, in some cases, it may even accelerate risk.

Professionals with mandatory training report significantly higher rates of unauthorized AI usage than those with no training at all. This suggests that awareness without adequate tools, access, or governance can push employees toward shadow solutions when official options fall short.

The workforce is ready and eager to adopt AI. However, the issue is whether organizations are providing credible, secure, and validated tools that match real-world needs.

From AI adoption to accountability

Taken together, the findings point to a clear conclusion: genAI strategy is now operating-model strategy.

Organizations that continue to focus solely on adoption metrics—usage rates, tool counts, experimentation—will miss the deeper shift underway. The next phase of the future of work is defined by accountability, not access.

Prepared organizations are:

Incorporating AI output validation directly into workflows

Treating trust as something to measure, not assume

Aligning training with approved tools and clear guardrails

Planning governance for AI that acts, not just assists

The defining shift of 2026 is no longer asking “Can AI do this?” but “Should we trust how it does this—and are we protected when it does?”

Are you AI-ready? Take the quiz

Next steps: Explore the AI and the Future of Work Report

This article highlights only a portion of the insights from the Future of Work Report 2026: Generative AI — Tool, Colleague, or Liability? The full report explores adoption patterns, readiness gaps, and governance risks across industries and provides leaders with a clearer view of where their organizations stand and what comes next.

To understand how your organization compares, and how to close the pace gap responsibly, download the full report.

Download the Full Report Get Industry-Specific Insights

How to Mitigate Reputational Risk: 5 Early Warning Signs of a PR Crisis

2026-03-20T17:00:00Z

How are you mitigating reputational risk? Learn how to spot 5 early warning signs of a PR crisis. Find tools to help you track more leading indicators. (read more)

Leading vs. Lagging Indicators in PR: Why Waiting for Headlines Is Too Late

2026-03-18T14:40:00Z

Leading vs. lagging indicators: Key differences, examples of PR applications, and how to use early signals to predict media coverage and reputation risk.(read more)

5 steps to Developing an Ethical Approach to AI

2026-03-18T11:04:00Z

AI offers significant opportunities for companies, but there are ethical concerns around the fast-emerging technology. Here are the top 5 ways to ensure you are ethically implementing AI into your workflow. (read more)

Best Practices for a Modern PR Campaign: Develop the Strategy

2026-02-27T14:49:00Z

In today's crowded media landscape, it can be challenging for businesses and organizations to get their message heard. Learn how to leverage your research to craft a strategic PR campaign. (read more)

4 tips for writing the best consulting pitch (with examples)

2026-02-19T06:44:00Z

Tips for writing a consulting pitch that wins more clients. See action steps for building a pitch proposals with examples. (read more)

10 common CIM mistakes (and how to fix them)

2025-11-12T23:22:00Z

Avoid the most common CIM mistakes in M&A. Learn how to create defensible, data-backed Confidential Information Memorandums with LexisNexis® insights.(read more)

How Consultants Can Use AI to Turn Market Triggers into New Business Opportunities

2025-11-03T19:09:00Z

In consulting, every opportunity starts with a market trigger, whether it be a change in leadership, a new industry regulation or an unexpected shift in investor sentiment. These trigger events can open doors for advisory work if you spot them early,...(read more)

Why Trusted Data Is the New Competitive Edge in AI-Powered Consulting

2025-11-03T18:18:00Z

AI is everywhere but credibility isn’t. With 80% of management consultants already using genAI tools in their daily work and over half saving three to four hours each day through AI integration, for many consulting firms, the question top of mi...(read more)

3 Ways Management Consultants Can Use AI-Ready Data to Win More Business

2025-10-31T13:10:00Z

Discover how Nexis+ AI™ and Nexis® Data+, help management consultants uncover opportunities, reduce risk, and power credible, compliant AI innovation.(read more)

The Giving Season surge: Why donations peak at the end of the year

2025-10-29T16:19:00Z

Giving season: Year-end giving stats, reasons for the surge, and how nonprofits can maximize their fundraising efforts during the holidays. (read more)

What Is Giving Tuesday? The History and Lessons Behind a Global Generosity Movement

2025-10-27T06:00:00Z

What is Giving Tuesday? Learn more about the history of the viral campaign + how you can prepare for your next fundraising campaign. (read more)

Where to Find Reliable Market Size and Competitor Data for AI

2025-10-07T12:41:00Z

Find reliable market size and competitor data: Identify trusted third-party providers, fuel accurate AI insights, and deliver client-ready intelligence.(read more)

How to Optimize Your Change Management Workflow

2025-09-26T07:20:00Z

Optimize your change management workflow: Learn how to use technology to document workflows, manage transitions, and proactively identify challenges.(read more)

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for Trusted Generative AI

2025-09-18T13:42:00Z

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for generative AI: ABCs of RAG, how to use in gen AI and LLMs. (read more)

Industry Insights