In the race to secure safe harbour easements under Pillar Two, many groups focus on high-value jurisdictions and core entities. But even non-material subsidiaries can carry tax risks that undermine group...
Complying with Pillar Two isn’t something the tax function can achieve in isolation. From data integrity to reporting architecture, the rules reach into finance, legal, and IT. But with the right...
Pillar Two marks a shift in global tax compliance, from retrospective annual reporting to real-time exposure management. For in-house tax teams, this means evolving from compliance executors to strategic...
As multinationals ramp up for Pillar Two compliance, the allure of automation and analytics is growing. But while technology can streamline, only well-documented, audit-ready processes can withstand regulator...
As Pillar Two raises the bar for tax data integrity, many multinationals are discovering their consolidation processes are no longer fit for purpose. Materiality thresholds set for financial reporting...
Pillar Two marks a shift in global tax compliance, from retrospective annual reporting to real-time exposure management. For in-house tax teams, this means evolving from compliance executors to strategic risk managers. The tools are changing. So is the mindset.
Traditional tax compliance follows a predictable cycle: prepare the return, file on time, address any queries post-period. But Pillar Two upends this structure. Tax leaders must now monitor group effective tax rates across multiple jurisdictions throughout the year, anticipating risks before they trigger top-up taxes.
Ross Robertson (BDO LLP) summed up the stakes in a recent Tolley webinar:
“If you break the safe harbour in year one, you can’t rely on it in years two or three for that jurisdiction. One missed risk, and you’re locked into full compliance.”
That reality makes annual reporting a risky lag indicator. In-house teams need live indicators instead.
To shift from static to strategic, your function must:
Safe harbour qualification is no longer just a compliance matter. It’s a dynamic, ongoing risk variable that must be preserved through careful planning.
Each of these could shift your jurisdictional ETR, pushing you above or below the Pillar Two threshold without any immediate visibility.
“Pillar Two determinations are a completely different playbook from corporate income tax. In-house teams must evolve their processes to manage that.” – Ross Robertson, BDO LLP
The GloBE rules introduce new audit risk and reputational pressure. Transactions that may have seemed tax-neutral historically now need forward-looking assessment.
To stay in control, leading in-house teams are:
EY and KPMG both warn that operational impact, not technical complexity, is the bigger threat under Pillar Two. The risk is not knowing where exposure could arise until it's too late.
To succeed under Pillar Two, tax needs earlier access to data and broader awareness within the business. Static compliance roles must evolve into dynamic risk advisory ones. That means moving closer to group strategy, restructuring and forecasting.
Explore how Tolley+ helps you monitor global risk in real time.
Watch the full webinar here