Part 3 of the “Are You Aloof About OMUFA, MDUFA, and GDUFA?” series. Final installment in a three-part series on FDA user fee programs. Part 1 covered OMUFA, Part 2 covered MDUFA, and this...
Part 2 of the “Are You Aloof About OMUFA, MDUFA, and GDUFA?” series. This is the second installment in a three-part series on FDA user fee programs. Part 1 covered OMUFA, and Part 3 will...
Part 1 of the “Are You Aloof About OMUFA, MDUFA, and GDUFA?” series. This is the first installment in a three-part series examining FDA user fee programs affecting OTC drugs, medical devices...
Drug Master Files, manufacturer listings, and Electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) submissions are foundational to regulatory compliance. Yet even experienced regulatory, quality, and operations...
The global Unique Device Identification (UDI) landscape is entering a critical enforcement phase — and 2026 will be a challenging year for medical device manufacturers operating in the European Union...
Part 2 of the “Are You Aloof About OMUFA, MDUFA, and GDUFA?” series.
This is the second installment in a three-part series on FDA user fee programs. Part 1 covered OMUFA, and Part 3 will address GDUFA.
When companies think about FDA medical device fees, they often focus on the submission: “How much will our 510(k), De Novo, or PMA cost?”
But MDUFA includes more than application fees. Most device establishments must also pay an annual registration fee, meaning total exposure may include:
MDUFA V runs through September 30, 2027, with MDUFA VI expected to follow in FY 2028.
$13,785 per establishment (up from $11,423 in FY 2026)
This fee is separate from any submission fee and applies to most FDA-registered device establishments. Companies with multiple facilities may face significantly higher total costs than expected.
FY 2027 runs from October 1, 2026, through September 30, 2027.
Example total costs (one establishment + one submission):
These figures exclude development, clinical, and regulatory preparation costs.
Most 510(k)s are fee-liable, but submissions routed through an FDA-accredited third-party review program are exempt from FDA’s 510(k) fee (though third-party reviewers may charge separately).
If qualified through FDA’s Small Business Determination program, companies may pay significantly reduced fees. For example:
However, eligibility is not automatic. Companies should plan early for:
Waiting too long may force payment of full fees.
The establishment registration fee is not automatically reduced for small businesses. A waiver may be granted only if:
Companies should budget for the full fee unless a waiver is formally approved.
Before October 1, 2026, companies should:
MDUFA costs are driven by both establishments and submissions, and surprises often come from overlooked registration fees or late pathway decisions.
Early alignment between regulatory, finance, and product teams helps avoid last-minute budget gaps and submission delays.
Reduce uncertainty in FDA user fee planning.
MDUFA planning should begin long before a submission is ready. Companies that align regulatory strategy with financial planning are better positioned to control costs and avoid delays.
Contact LexisNexis Life Sciences to learn how integrated establishment, product, and submission data can help your team forecast MDUFA costs more accurately and avoid last-minute surprises.
Next in the series: Part 3 explores GDUFA and the complexity of generic drug user fees across applications, affiliates, and facilities.
Editorial note: Fee figures are current as of August 13, 2026. Companies should confirm current FDA requirements before making payment or submission decisions.