Menu SIGN IN
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 1 year ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Rohr v. Salt River Project Agric. Improvement & Power Dist.

    Plaintiff former employee, who was an insulin-dependent type 2 diabetic, brought suit for employment discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C.S. § 12101 et seq. The District Court granted summary judgment...
  • baerreedauthor
    baerreedauthor
    • over 1 year ago
    • Casebrief
    • Baer Reed

    Sharon v. Sharon

    Defendant promisor sought review of the decision entered judgment in favor of plaintiff promisee in the promisee's action to collect installments alleged to be due and owing to her pursuant to a written contract between the parties.
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Waltermyer v. Aluminum Co. of America

    Waltermyer v. Aluminum Co. of America United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit September 30, 1986, Argued ; November 7, 1986, Filed No. 86-3156 Opinion  [*821]  OPINION OF THE COURT WEIS, Circuit Judge. The question in this case is whether...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    SEC v. Spartan Sec. Grp., Ltd.

    SEC v. Spartan Sec. Grp., Ltd. United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division August 10, 2022, Decided; August 10, 2022, Filed Case No. 8:19-cv-448-VMC-CPT Opinion  [*1214]  ORDER Before the Court is the Motion for Remedies...
  • Sherica Celine
    Sherica Celine
    • over 2 years ago
    • Practical Guidance Journal
    • pa

    No-Poach Agreement as Per Se Violations of the Antitrust Law

    By: Laurie E. Leader EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, BENDER'S LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT BULLETIN The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) is aggressively prosecuting employers who enter into no-poach agreements 1 under the antitrust laws. Until 2021, DOJ enforcement...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Sandifer v. U.S. Steel Corp.

    Sandifer v. U.S. Steel Corp. Supreme Court of the United States November 4, 2013, Argued; January 27, 2014, Decided No. 12-417 Opinion  [***735]  JUSTICE Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 The question before us is the meaning  [****6]  of the...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Paloian v. LaSalle Bank N.A (In re Doctors Hosp. of Hyde Park, Inc.)

    Paloian v. LaSalle Bank N.A (In re Doctors Hosp. of Hyde Park, Inc.) United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division April 10, 2014, Decided Bankruptcy No. 00-bk-11520, Chapter 11, Adversary No. 11-ap-1983 Opinion...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Oracle United States, Inc. v. Rimini St.

    Oracle United States, Inc. v. Rimini St. United States District Court for the District of Nevada September 21, 2016, Decided; September 21, 2016, Filed 2:10-CV-00106-LRH-PAL Opinion  [*1206]  ORDER Before the court are plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc.;  [...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    New York v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.

    New York v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. Supreme Court of the United States December 19, 1952, Argued ; January 12, 1953, Decided No. 203 Opinion  [*294]   [**300]   [***335]  MR. JUSTICE BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court. The question presented...
  • Vinayak Kohli
    Vinayak Kohli
    • over 2 years ago
    • Case Opinion
    • case

    Martinez v. Badis

    Martinez v. Badis Supreme Court of Colorado December 14, 1992, Decided NO. 91SC489 Opinion  [*247]  In Badis v. Martinez, 819 P.2d 551 (Colo. App. 1991) , the Colorado Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's judgment dismissing a complaint filed...
<>
LexisNexis
privacy policy consumer access terms & conditions Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
LexisNexis