The appellate court's finding that the disciplinary procedures violated due process was affirmed, but its retroactive application of such procedures and its holding that the prison's policy of inspecting attorney mail was unconstitutional were reversed. The case was remanded in accordance with the appellate court's directive that the capacity of the inmate legal adviser to assist with habeas petitions and...

The judgment of the district court granting summary judgment for the defendant was vacated and the case was remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Judgment reversed. 5-3 decision; 2 dissents.

The Court reversed the appellate court's finding that a provision of the Bail Reform Act of 1984 was unconstitutional. The Court held that it was not unconstitutional for a federal court to detain an arrestee pending trial if the government demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that no release conditions would reasonably assure the safety of any other person and the community.

The Court affirmed the state court's judgment of conviction.

The appellate court's judgment was reversed, and the matter was remanded to that court with directions to: (1) reinstate a single harassment award of $ 500,000 against both the employer and supervisor; (2) reinstate the jury's $ 3,000 punitive damages award against the supervisor; and (3) to modify the punitive damages award against the employer to $ 1,905,000.

The court issued a peremptory writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate the challenged order and to enter a new order directing the disclosure of contact information for the individuals identified in response to the interrogatory.

Judgment affirmed.

Burglary-murder and robbery-murder special-circumstance findings vacated; otherwise affirmed.

The Court affirmed the judgment of the court of appeals.

The Court reversed the appellate court's judgment and remanded for further proceedings.

The decision that reversed the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant drug company was reversed, and the case was remanded for consideration of other claims asserted by plaintiffs, father and administrator. Even under the more lenient rule governing accrual of a cause of action for wrongful death, plaintiffs failed to bring their action within the applicable limitations period.

The court granted the mandate petition, directing the trial court to vacate its order denying the motion to withdraw the admission and awarding sanctions, and to issue a new order granting the motion to withdraw the admission and denying in full real parties' motion for sanctions.

The court reversed the judgment of the court of appeal.

Judgment reversed; case remanded. 6-2 Decision; 1 dissent.

The court affirmed the order.

The court modified the judgment to reinstate the breach of fiduciary duty and fraud counts against the managing partner as well as the count seeking an equitable accounting.

Judgment reversed; 5-3 decision; 1 concurrence, 1 dissent.

The Supreme Court reversed the appellate court's holding that defendant had validly waived his right to counsel.

Judgment reversed and remanded.

The court affirmed the judgment of the court of appeal.

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was reversed. 5-4 Decision; one opinion, one concurrence, one dissent.

The judgment was reversed. The trial court erred in sustaining the demurrers because plaintiffs' complaint sufficiently stated claims for injunctive relief and restitution under the unfair competition and false advertising statutes. The individual plaintiffs should have been permitted to amend their fraud claims to allege damages specifically.

Writ of certiorari was granted, and judgment reversing grant of summary judgment to petitioner was reversed.

Judgment reversed; case remanded. 9-0 decision; 1 concurrence.