LEGAL NEWS & ANALYSIS
-
Lexis+ AI
Save time working at the speed of AI, generate better work product, and realize cost-savings with the new, secure generative AI platform from LexisNexis®
ExploreJoin Now -
Lexis+
Experience results with superior research, data-driven insights, and practical guidance, all via one premium legal solution
ExploreSign In -
Nexis
Premium & online news and business sources - expertly curated just for you in one database
ExploreSign In -
Nexis Newsdesk
Powerful media monitoring and analytics to quickly uncover critical insights about your brand, competitors, and market
ExploreSign In -
LexisNexis IP Solutions
A comprehensive, accurate and easy-to-use approach to patent analytics and patent research
Explore -
Print & eBooks
Full collection of legal titles from Matthew Bender and other trusted publishers, plus the most legal eBooks anywhere
Shop
-
Pacific Gas & E. Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage etc. Co.
S. F. No. 22580
Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in an action for damages for injury to property under an indemnity clause of a contract.
VIEW CASE OPINION -
People v. Sanchez
S216681
CORRIGAN, J.—In Crawford v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36 [158 L. Ed. 2d 177, 124 S. Ct. 1354] (Crawford), the United States Supreme Court held, with exceptions not relevant here, that ] the admission of testimonial hearsay against a criminal defendant violates the Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine witnesses.
VIEW CASE OPINION -
In re Caremark Int'l
CONSOLIDATED CIVIL ACTION NO. 13670
Pending is a motion pursuant to Chancery Rule 23.1 to approve as fair and reasonable a proposed settlement of a consolidated derivative action on behalf of Caremark International, [**2] Inc. ("Caremark").
VIEW CASE OPINION -
Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.
A-51
This case presents the question whether an employee at will has a cause of action against her employer to recover damages for the termination of her employment following her refusal to continue a project she viewed as medically unethical.
VIEW CASE OPINION
