Dioguardi v. Durning

139 F.2d 774 (2d Cir. 1944)

 

RULE:

There is no pleading requirement of stating facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, but only that there be a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a))

FACTS:

Plaintiff brought a negligence action against the Collector of Customs, alleging that he sold plaintiff's merchandise at a lower price than requested and that he was somehow responsible for the disappearance of some of plaintiff's goods. The district court dismissed the complaint for failing to state a cause of action. The case was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals.

ISSUE:

Must a complaint state a cause of action?

ANSWER:

No.

CONCLUSION:

The Court ruled that under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) all that was  required was a short and plain statement of  claim showing entitlement to relief. Plaintiff was not required to plead facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, which is what the lower court appeared to be seeking. The court found that because a person in defendant's position could be held personally liable for negligence in performance of his duties, plaintiff sufficiently stated his claim.

Click here to view the full text case and earn your Daily Research Points.