Muller v. Oregon

208 U.S. 412, 28 S. Ct. 324, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1452, 52 L. Ed. 551

 

RULE:

A difference in the sexes justifies a difference in legislation and upholds that which is designed to compensate for some of the burdens which rest upon her. 

FACTS:

Oregon enacted a law that limited women to ten hours of work in factories and laundries. Curt Muller, the owner of a laundry business, was fined when he violated the law. Muller appealed. The constitutionality of the law was upheld by the state supreme court. 

ISSUE:

Does an Oregon law that limits the hours that a woman are allowed to work, violate the Fourteenth Amendment?

ANSWER:

No.

CONCLUSION:

The court reasoned that women needed protective legislation due to their social role in society. 

Click here to view the full text case and earn your Daily Research Points.