United States v. Jewell

532 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1976)

 

RULE:

When knowledge of the existence of a particular fact is an element of an offense, such knowledge is established if a person is aware of a high probability of its existence, unless he actually believes that it does not exist.

FACTS:

Defendant was convicted of possessing marihuana, a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a)(1). At trial, the jury was instructed that violation of the statute required specific intent and that "knowledge" under the statute did not require that defendant had "positive knowledge" that a controlled substance was involved. On appeal, the court affirmed.

ISSUE:

Is positive knowledge required for cases relating to possession of controlled substances?

ANSWER:

No.

CONCLUSION:

The court also held that "knowledge" under § 841(a)(1) encompassed not only "positive knowledge" but also "deliberate ignorance." Thus, evidence demonstrating that defendant was aware of the involvement of controlled substances, but consciously avoided "positive knowledge," allowed a jury conviction of defendant. Since there was evidence demonstrating that defendant deliberately avoided positive knowledge of the presence of controlled substances, defendant's conviction was affirmed.

Click here to view the full text case and earn your Daily Research Points.