Emerging Issues Analysis, James M. Lawniczak addresses decisions from the Third
and Fifth Circuits holding that secured creditors do not have an absolute legal
right to credit bid when their collateral is sold through a plan of
reorganization. While there may be a small swing in negotiation power towards
plan proponents and away from secured creditors, he concludes that the
decisions may not have that much practical significance.
NOTE: The case and statute links below may
be accessed by lexis.com subscribers.
Non-subscribers may obtain research packages by the day, week, or month at lexisONE
Mr. Lawniczak writes: In September 2009 and in March 2010,
the Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Third Circuits each considered whether
a plan of reorganization could be confirmed over the objection of a secured
creditor where the collateral was sold and the secured creditor was not given
an opportunity to credit bid. In re Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC (free, unenhanced version available), 2010 U.S. App.
LEXIS 5805 (3d Cir. Mar. 22, 2010); Bank of New York Trust Co., NA v. Official Unsecured Creditors'
Comm. (In re Pacific Lumber Co.), 584 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. Tex. 2009).
Section 1129(b)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code was the applicable statutory
provision that the two courts considered and interpreted.
The legal issue before each court was one of statutory interpretation-whether Bankruptcy Code section 1129(b)(2)(A)(ii), which provides
that a plan can be confirmed over the objection of a secured creditor where the
collateral is being sold and the secured creditor has the right to credit bid,
is the exclusive provision of the Bankruptcy Code applicable to sales pursuant
to a plan. The interpretation adopted by both courts of appeals allows plans to
be confirmed over the objection of a secured creditor that is given the
"indubitable equivalent" of its claim, because section 1129(b)(2)(A)(iii) is also available to a plan
proponent even when collateral was being sold. Therefore, according to both
courts, the right to credit bid when collateral is sold under a plan of
reorganization is not absolute.
* * *
question before the courts of appeals in Philadelphia Newspapers and Pacific
Lumber was whether a plan proponent seeking cramdown against a secured
creditor class that does not accept the plan must use clause (ii) of section 1129(b)(2)(A). If yes, then the secured creditor
would have an absolute right to credit bid unless, under section 363(k), "the
court for cause orders otherwise." If the answer is no, then the plan proponent
could proceed under clause (iii) and attempt to confirm the plan by proving
that it had provided the secured creditor with the "indubitable equivalent" of
Access the full version of "A Secured Creditor's Absolute
Legal Right to Credit Bid under 11 U.S.C. § 1129(b)(2)(A)" with your
If you do not have a lexis.com ID,
you can purchase the Emerging Issues Analysis content through our lexisONE Research Packages
See also: Podcast: LexisNexis®
Bankruptcy Law Community Podcast featuring James Lawniczak of Calfee, Halter
& Griswold on a secured creditor's absolute legal right to credit bid