When HP announced its intention to acquire Autonomy, the
British data analysis firm now mired
in accusations of serious fraud, Deloitte probably shed some enormous tears
of joy. Deloitte was more than happy, I'm sure, to rid itself of the Autonomy audit albatross. That may surprise some of you,
UK was the long time auditor of Autonomy, and would lose that job and its
nice fees, to HP's
auditor Ernst & Young.
To the victor's auditor go the audit spoils.
But that's not how the Big Four audit industry game is
played now that consulting
is again King. What Deloitte would lose in audit fees - reportedly £5.422m
for Autonomy's audits during the last four years - the firm could now
openly replace with guilt-free consulting.
According to filings, Deloitte earned an additional
£4.44m from Autonomy in the last four years for services such as tax
compliance, due diligence for acquisitions and other services "pursuant to
legislation". As the preeminent Big Four tax services provider, HP's auditor
Ernst & Young, HP's auditor, would likely start doing everything tax
related for Autonomy. However, Deloitte was now free to team with Autonomy and
all of its technology products as an alliance partner for systems integration
engagements. That could be worth billions in consulting revenue that Deloitte's
UK firm, at least, had given up to be the auditor of a fast growing, highly
acquisitive technology "Fast
There are differences in the legislation enacted to
restore confidence in audits by the United States after Arthur Andersen's Enron
piggishness - Sarbanes-Oxley - and the regulations that govern UK listed
companies and their auditors. For example, the UK does not bar an auditor from
also providing internal audit services to a company it audits.
Regulations in the US and UK do prohibit business
alliance relationships between an auditor and its audit client. The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) is
the UK's lead audit regulator. APB Ethical Standard 2, Financial, Business,
Employment and Personal Relationships, states:
Audit firms, persons in a position to influence the
conduct and outcome of the audit and immediate family members of such persons
shall not enter into business relationships with an audited entity, its
management or its affiliates except where they involve the purchase of goods
and services from the audit firm or the audited entity in the ordinary course
of business and on an arm's length basis and which are not material to
either party or are clearly inconsequential to either party.
Read this article in its entirety at the re: The Auditors, a blog
by Francine McKenna.
For more information about LexisNexis
products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.