Do You Need Those Stinkin' Signatures? Maybe Not.

Do You Need Those Stinkin' Signatures? Maybe Not.

Let's say you are a corporate lawyer. You spend your pitiful and lonely life surrounded by marked up papers and red pens, drafting or revising agreements. You send your final versions out to your clients to sign, with those annoying little "sign here" stickers.

Then, the big day finally comes. Your work is in court and the case turns on an agreement that you drafted. But it wasn't signed by everybody concerned. It's a nightmare. What's going to happen?

Your astonishingly bright (and good looking) litigation partner says "No sweat. We don't need no stinkin' signatures."  Is he or she right?

He or she might be, based on Judge Gale's decision last week in Hawes v. Vandoros, 2013 NCBC 31 [an enhanced version of this opinion is available to lexis.com subscribers]. The parties were all joint owners of two investment beach houses. When they refinanced the houses, most of them signed "contribution agreements" providing that they would each pay a pro rata share of the monthly payments due under the new loans.

Read this article in its entirety on North Carolina Business Litigation Report, a blog for lawyers focusing on issues of North Carolina business law and the day-to-day practice of business litigation in North Carolina courts.

For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.