This article was reprinted with permission from FCPA Professor
Wal-Mart’s FCPA expenses continue to grow, scrutiny alerts and updates, in the blink of an eye, and for the reading stack. It’s all here in the Friday roundup.
Wal-Mart’s FCPA Expenses
As highlighted in this previous post, last FY Wal-Mart’s FCPA professional fees and expenses were approximately $604,000 per working day. As highlighted in this previous post, for Q1 of this FY Wal-Mart’s FCPA professional fees and expenses were approximately $1.16 million per working day.
Yesterday, in a Q2 earnings conference call, Wal-Mart executives stated:
“Expenses related to FCPA and compliance matters were approximately $82 million, which was above our forecasted range of $65 to $70 million. Approximately $48 million of these expenses represented costs incurred for the ongoing inquiries and investigations. Approximately $34 million is related to global compliance programs and organizational enhancements.”
Doing the math, Wal-Mart’s second quarter FCPA-related professional fees and expenses equal approximately $1.26 million per working day.
In this release, Wal-Mart stated:
“We believe expenses for FCPA matters and compliance programs will be between $75 and $80 million for both the third and fourth quarters.”
The question again ought to be asked – does it really need to cost this much or has FCPA scrutiny turned into a boondoggle for many involved? For more on this issue, see my article “Big, Bold, and Bizarre: The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enters a New Era.
Scrutiny Alerts and Updates
Add Novartis to the list of pharma companies under scrutiny by Chinese law enforcement for business practices in China. This Wall Street Journal article states:
“Novartis AG has opened an investigation into possible misconduct at its Chinese operations after a former employee filed a complaint about the Swiss pharmaceutical company’s business practices with labor authorities in China. Basel-Switzerland based Novartis said … its Business Practices Office, which looks into reported misconduct, is in charge of the investigation. The company said the former employee had asked for 5 million yuan (approximately $800,000) in compensation after resigning but declined to comment further.”
Allied Defense Group
Allied Defense Group (“ADG”) employed Mark Frederick Morales, one of the individuals charged in the failed Africa Sting enforcement action. As noted in this previous post, in August 2012, the ADG disclosed:
“In February and March, 2012, the DOJ dismissed charges against all individuals indicted in the FCPA sting operation, including the former employee of MECAR USA [an operating business of ADG]. Since this time, the Company’s FCPA counsel has had several discussions with the DOJ and SEC regarding the agencies’ respective inquiries. Based upon these discussions, it appears likely that resolution of these inquiries will involve a payment by the Company to at least one of these government agencies in connection with at least one transaction involving the former employee of Mecar USA. At this point, the amount of this payment is undeterminable.”
ADG recently disclosed:
“In late 2012, the SEC advised that it will not pursue an enforcement action against the Company and in early August 2013, the DOJ advised that it has decided to close its inquiry into this matter.”
In The Blink Of An Eye
As highlighted last week in the Friday Roundup, last week Juniper Networks disclosed:
“The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice are conducting investigations into possible violations by the Company of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The Company is cooperating with these agencies regarding these matters. The Company is unable to predict the duration, scope or outcome of these investigations.”
Whether because of three sentences or other information in the company’s quarterly filing, the company’s stock dropped approximately 5.5% last Friday.
72 hours later?
Why of course a securities fraud class action complaint.
This beats the 100 hour threshold highlighted in this previous blink of an eye post.
A revealing Op-Ed from a member of the Indian Administrative Services in the Times of India which “looks at the games lower bureaucracy plays — sometimes on its own, at other times in collusion with the top — which kill entrepreneurship and capitalism in India” and which also provide breeding grounds in which harassment bribery flourishes.
An FCPA Mid-Year Update from BakerHostetler.
A good weekend to all.
Read more articles on the FCPA by Mike Koehler at FCPA Professor.
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.