Barron v. Igolnikov, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22267 (S.D.N.Y. March 10, 2010)

Barron v. Igolnikov, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22267 (S.D.N.Y. March 10, 2010)

LexisNexis Core Terms: Martin Act, class action, invested, investors, customers, omission, feeder, fiduciary duty, state-law, deception, partner, partnership interests, fraudulent, preempted, putative, managed, red flags, partnership agreement, factual allegations, misrepresentation, Partnership, investing, stock, preemption, law claims, federal law, aiding and abetting, gross negligence, matter jurisdiction, failure to state a claim

Counsel: For Andrea Barron, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff: Gerald Harlan Silk, Jeroen Van Kwawegen, Lead AttorneyS, Avi Josefson, Lauren Amy McMillen, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, New York, NY.

For Roman Igolnikov, Sheldon S. Gordon, Matthew Stadtmauer, Union Bancaire Privee, Union Bancaire Privee Asset Management LLC, Daniel De Picciotto, Michael De Picciotto, Guy De Picciotto, Defendants: Herbert M Wachtell, Stephen R. DiPrima, Lead AttorneyS, Emil Kleinhaus, Graham William Meli, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York, NY.

Judge: Thomas P. Griesa, United States District Judge. subscribers can view the enhanced version of Barron v. Igolnikov

  • Tags: