United States v. Rigas, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9670 (3d Cir. May 12, 2010)

United States v. Rigas, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9670 (3d Cir. May 12, 2010)

LexisNexis Core Terms: conspiracy, indictment, defraud, double jeopardy, commit, duplicity, overt act, conspiracy to defraud, single offense, collateral estoppel, stock, separate offenses, duplicitous, sentence, family members, convicted, firearm, conspiracy to commit, statutory provisions, quotation, wire fraud, citations omitted, totality-of-the-circumstances, jeopardy, double, tax evasion, distinct offenses, multiple punishments, conspiratorial, conspiring

Counsel: Lawrence G. McMichael, Esq. (ARGUED) Matthew P. Faranda-Diedrich, Esq., Patrick M. Northern, Esq., Dilworth Paxson, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph U. Metz, Esq., Dilworth Paxson, Harrisburg, PA, Counsel for Appellants.

Alan Hechtkopf, Esq., Alexander P. Robbins, Esq. (ARGUED) United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC; George J. Rocktashel, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Williamsport, PA, Counsel for Appellees.

JUDGES: Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, SCIRICA, RENDELL, BARRY, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges. RENDELL, Circuit Judge, with whom SCIRICA, CHAGARES and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges, join - dissenting.


Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of United States v. Rigas

Non-subscribers can view the free, unenhanced version of United States v. Rigas on lexisONE's Free Case Law