Fox v. Jamdat Mobile, 2010 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3799 (Cal. App. May 25, 2010)

Fox v. Jamdat Mobile, 2010 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3799 (Cal. App. May 25, 2010)

LexisNexis Core Terms: acquisition, shareholder, demurrer, ratification, cause of action, voting, proxy statement, exclusivity, stock, duty of loyalty, merger, board of directors, merger agreement, proxy, fiduciary, per share, judicial notice, sufficient information, diligence, duty of care, disclosure, approve, confidentiality, wireless, mobile, metrics, buyers, common stock, stockholder's, sustaining

Counsel: Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins, Randall J. Baron, Kevin K. Green and David T. Wissbroecker, for Plaintiff and Intervenor-Appellant.

Fenwick & West, Kevin P. Muck, Felix S. Lee and Christine A. Vogelei, for Defendants and Respondents.

Judge: RUBIN, J. WE CONCUR: BIGELOW, P. J., FLIER, J.

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Fox v. Jamdat Mobile

 

  • Tags: