Fulbright Hydraulic Fracking Blog: Pa. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Appeal in Butler Case

Fulbright Hydraulic Fracking Blog: Pa. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Appeal in Butler Case


On April 3, 2012 the Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted a petition for allowance of appeal in the Butler case.

In Butler, the Superior Court overturned the decision of a Court of Common Pleas regarding deed language, specifically the definition of "minerals" as it relates to oil and gas rights in Pennsylvania. See Fulbright's Alert, When is a Mineral Not a Mineral?.

In its Order granting the petition for allowance of appeal, the Supreme Court accepted the petitioner's framing of the issue:

In interpreting a deed reservation for minerals, whether the Superior Court erred in remanding the case for the introduction of scientific and historic evidence about the Marcellus shale and the natural gas contained therein, despite the fact that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held (1) a rebuttable presumption exists that parties intend the term minerals to include only metallic substances, and (2) only the parties' intent can rebut the presumption to include non-metallic substances.


See the Butler Docket Sheet. 


This post was prepared by Fulbright energy lawyer Jeremy Mercer.

Sign in with your Lexis.com ID to access additional materials on hydro-fracking in Energy Law and Transactions: Shale Gas Development and Hydraulic Fracturing (Matthew Bender).

If you do not have a Lexis.com ID, you can purchase Energy Law and Transactions (Matthew Bender).

For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions, connect with us through our corporate site.