By Kurt Krieger
On November 15, 2012, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") issued a Notice of Inquiry ("NOI") - a pre-cursor to a possible notice of proposed rulemaking - seeking comments on whether it should require quarterly reporting and delayed public disclosure of "every natural gas transaction within [FERC's] jurisdiction that entails physical delivery for the next [gas] day or for the next month. . . ." Comments on this NOI must be filed with FERC within 60 days. In addition to considering FERC's new NOI, all companies engaging in the purchase and sale of natural gas should take a moment to ensure they are complying with FERC's similar and existing natural gas transaction reporting requirements embodied in FERC Form No. 552.
In the Energy Policy Act of 2005 ("EPAct 2005"), FERC was directed to "facilitate price transparency in markets for the sale or transportation of physical natural gas in interstate commerce" and enabled FERC to collect data from natural gas market participants. Under this natural gas market transparency provision, FERC issued a series of orders resulting in a new Form No. 552, and requiring "any buyer or seller of more than a de minimis volume of natural gas report volumes of relevant transactions in an annual filing using" Form No. 552 (generally, those buying or selling above 2.2 Bcf annually of wholesale gas for next day or next month delivery; and is a requirement that applies to more than just the traditional, FERC-regulated companies.) Other provisions in EPAct 2005 also further empowered FERC to prohibit certain market manipulation in natural gas markets. In addition to the data reported to FERC on Form Nos. 552, FERC independently reviews prices and transactions in data received from the Intercontinental Exchange ("ICE") and from NYMEX.
In the NOI, FERC states that it now "has identified additional areas of the natural gas market in which it believes increased transparency may be necessary for market participants to better understand the market activities that produce the prices that are reported to indices." FERC asserts that this additional information may be necessary to help the FERC detect and deter "market manipulation in the natural gas markets." In the NOI, FERC observes the deficiencies in currently available data, and seeks comment on the idea of requiring quarterly, electronic reporting of the following additional data elements for all jurisdictional transactions involving physical next day or month delivery:
Furthermore, FERC is "considering releasing the transactional information to the public on a quarterly basis, one month after it is reported to [FERC]."
The FERC's goal - as with all of its transparency initiatives - is to facilitate greater price transparency, provide for a better understanding of trading and pricing that contributes to daily and monthly price indices, and increase confidence in the indices and natural gas prices and markets. As the FERC considers its proposal, it seeks public comments on how to enhance natural gas market transparency, and comments on numerous specific questions set forth in the NOI. A copy of the NOI can be accessed here.
Kurt Krieger focuses his practice in the area of energy law with experience representing interstate natural gas pipeline companies, midstream companies and public utilities before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and state and commonwealth public service (or utility) commissions.
Sign in with your Lexis.com ID to access additional materials on hydro-fracking in Energy Law and Transactions: Shale Gas Development and Hydraulic Fracturing (Matthew Bender).
If you do not have a Lexis.com ID, you can purchase Energy Law and Transactions (Matthew Bender).
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions, connect with us through our corporate site.