this Analysis, Pamela Revak covers grantor and beneficiary reporting
obligations under I.R.C. Code Section 679 with respect to foreign trusts with
U.S. beneficiaries. She writes:
are often created in foreign jurisdictions in an attempt to provide asset
protection and/or tax savings. Regulations under 26 C.F.R. § 301 provide that a trust is treated as a
"United States person if":
(1) A court within the United States is able
to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust. This is
referred to as the "court test."
(2) One or more United States' persons have
the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust. This is
referred to as the "control test."
trust that does not meet the court test or the control test is treated as a
foreign trust. These tests are not as simple as they might appear. A trust that
directs administration outside the United States or any domestic trust subject
to an "automatic migration" of a provision would not meet the court
test and would, consequently, be treated as a foreign trust. An automatic
migration provision is one that would cause the trust to migrate from the
United States if a U.S. court attempts to assert jurisdiction, directly or
indirectly, except in the case of a foreign invasion, or widespread
confiscation or nationalization of property in the United States.
Access the full version of Administration of Foreign
Trusts with your lexis.com ID. Additional fees may be incurred. (approx. 5
If you do not have a
lexis.com ID, you can purchase this commentary and additional Emerging Issues
Analysis content at the LexisNexis Store.
. . . .
Explore the LEXIS.com Estates, Gifts & Trusts and Elder Law resources
Discover the features and benefits of LexisNexis® Tax Center
For more information about LexisNexis products and
solutions connect with us through our corporate