Simultaneously with issuance of the final Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) regulations, on October 20, 2011 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (OIG) jointly released an interim final rule establishing waivers (Waivers) of the application of certain health care fraud and abuse laws in connection with Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) that participate, or are interested in participating, in the MSSP. Consistent with the final MSSP regulations, this interim final rule reflects the government's desire to encourage broader participation in the MSSP. This Alert describes the CMS/OIG interim final rule and each of the Waivers. It is one in a series of Foley Alerts addressing the new ACO MSSP regulations and other government announcements concerning ACOs.
CMS/OIG Interim Final Rule
On April 7, 2011, CMS and OIG jointly published a proposed rule with an opportunity for comment on proposed waivers and waiver-design considerations in connection with the MSSP. Simultaneously with the release of final MSSP regulations, CMS and OIG jointly released on October 20, 2011 an interim final rule with the opportunity for comment (IFC). The IFC reflects CMS's conclusion that to carry out the MSSP, it is necessary or appropriate to waive certain provisions of the Physician Self-Referral Rule (Stark Law), the federal anti-kickback statute (AKS), the Civil Monetary Penalty (CMP) law prohibiting hospital payments to reduce or limit services (Gainsharing CMP), and the CMP law prohibiting inducements to beneficiaries (Beneficiary Inducement CMP) (collectively, the fraud and abuse laws).
The waivers apply only to the MSSP and to ACOs participating in the MSSP. Moreover, there is no waiver, even for the MSSP, for state laws that are similar to the fraud and abuse laws.
The Proposed Waiver Regulations
The proposed waivers issued in April 2011 included waivers of the Stark Law and the AKS for distributions of shared savings paid by CMS under the MSSP 1) to or among ACO participants or ACO providers/suppliers, or 2) for activities necessary for and directly related to the ACO's participation in and operations under the MSSP. The proposed waivers also included waivers of AKS provisions with respect to financial relationships that implicated and fully complied with an exception to the Stark Law and waiver of application of the Gainsharing CMP 1) for distributions of shared savings received by an ACO under the MSSP, where distributions are made by a hospital to a physician (provided the payments were not made knowingly to induce a physician to limit medically necessary items or services), and 2) for any financial relationship under the MSSP that implicated the Stark Law and fully complied with an exception to the Stark Law.
No waivers were put forward in the proposed regulations for setting up or operating the ACO; rather the proposed waivers only related distributions of the shared savings earned in the MSSP.
IFC Waivers: Overview
Based on CMS/OIG's consideration of numerous comments it received regarding the proposed waivers, the October 2011 IFC establishes five Waivers. According to CMS/OIG, the Waivers are intended to afford flexibility to ACOs in varying circumstances. They are designed to be self-implementing, to apply consistently across waived fraud and abuse laws, and to apply uniformly to each ACO, ACO participant, and ACO provider/supplier participating in the MSSP.
The five Waivers are:
ACO Pre-Participation Waiver. This Waiver, designed to allow potential ACOs and ACO participants to share resources to start ACOs, waives the fraud and abuse laws for start-up arrangements that meet all of the following conditions:
If all conditions are met, the Waiver period starts on the date of publication of the IFC for a 2012 target date or one year preceding an application due date for subsequent target dates. The Waiver period ends 1) for ACOs that enter a participation agreement, on the start date of such agreement, 2) for ACOs that apply for participation but whose application is denied, on the denial date - or six months thereafter for an arrangement that qualified for the Waiver before the denial, or, 3) for ACOs that fail to submit an application on the application due date or the date the ACO submits reasons for not applying (with some ability to extend the time for good reasons for failing to submit an application).
ACO Participation Waiver. Under this Waiver, an arrangement between the ACO, one or more ACO participants, and/or ACO providers/suppliers, is not a violation of the fraud and abuse laws, if all of the following conditions are met:
If all conditions are met, the Waiver will start on the start date of participation in the MSSP and expire six months after expiration of such participation agreement, including any renewals, or the date of the ACO's voluntary termination.
Shared Savings Distribution Waiver. This Waiver waives the fraud and abuse laws with respect to the distribution or use of shared savings earned by the ACO under the MSSP, provided all the following conditions are met:
Compliance With the Stark Law Waiver. This Waiver waives the AKS and Gainsharing CMP with respect to any financial relationship between or among the ACO, its ACO participants, an
and its ACO providers/suppliers that implicates the Stark Law, provided all the following conditions are met:
This Waiver commences on the start date of a participation agreement and ends upon the earlier of expiration of any proration or termination of this agreement.
Waiver for Patient Incentives. This Waiver waives application of the Beneficiary Inducement CMP and the AKS for items or services provided by an ACO, its ACO participants, or its ACO providers/suppliers to beneficiaries for free or below fair-market value if all of the following four conditions are all met:
This Waiver commences on the start date of a participation agreement and ends on the earlier of expiration or termination of the participation agreement.
Certain Applicable Definitions and Standards
The IFC and the five exceptions embody certain definitions of terms that are used to provide safeguards. Among the terms with particular definitions are:
Reasonably related to the purposes of the MSSP. The purposes of the MSSP consist of:
CMS requests comments on how they may further define the purposes of the MSSP.
Start-up arrangements. The Pre-Participation Waiver permits certain arrangements to be undertaken by appropriate parties in connection with developing an ACO, including financial relationships related to start-up arrangements during the participation phase. Start-up arrangements are defined to mean:
The IFC lists the following 14 arrangements that may qualify as start-up arrangements:
1. Infrastructure creation and provision
2. Network development and management
3. Care coordination mechanisms
4. Clinical management systems
5. Quality improvement mechanisms
6. Creation of governance and management structure
7. Care utilization management
8. Creation of incentives for performance-based payment systems and transitions from fee-for-service
9. Hiring of new staff to be involved (including care coordinators, quality leadership, organization management, analytical team, liaison team, IT support, and risk management)
10. Information technology (including EHR systems, electronic health information exchange, data reporting systems, and data analytics)
11. Consultant and other professional support (including market analysis, legal services, and financial and accounting services)
12. Organization and staff training
13. Incentives to attract primary care physicians
14. Capital investments (including loans, capital contributions, grants, and withholds)
Additional Safeguards Applicable to the ACO Pre-Participation and ACO Participation Waivers
Bona fide determination of ACO governing body. The ACO Pre-Participation and ACO Participation Waivers require the ACO's governing body to make a bona fide determination that an arrangement is reasonably related to the purposes of the MSSP, and that the arrangement be duly authorized by the governing body.
Audit trail. The ACO Pre-Participation and ACO Participation Waivers require an audit trail of contemporaneous documentation, which must include the basis for arrangement and be maintained and available to the Secretary of HHS upon request for 10 years. CMS/OIG also note that under the ACO regulations, the governing board must have a meaningful conflict-of-interest policy that applies to this determination. CMS/OIG warn the governing body to exercise diligence in making the determination and to articulate its reasoning.
Transparency requirement. This requires public disclosure describing the arrangement (without a need to disclose financial or economic terms). The goals of this transparency requirement are that there be no secret arrangements, that information concerning the arrangement is available to other parties and regulators, and that the availability of information to will help establish an incentive to exercise due diligence.
In the commentary announcing the IFC, CMS/OIG also note:
The IFC is effective on the date of its publication in the Federal Register (scheduled to be November 2, 2011). The IFC is subject to a 60-day comment period. CMS may elect to modify the final regulations based on comments received.
CMS/OIG have significantly greater flexibility through waivers of application of the Stark Law, AKS, Gainsharing CMP, and Beneficiary Inducement CMP for ACOs applying for and participating in the MSSP. Those who have worried about the need for arrangements that may implicate those fraud and abuse laws will find more protection is available for arrangements designed to meet the defined purposes of the MSSP. Moreover, the waivers may offer certain providers incentives for participation in the MSSP, as they allow alignment strategies between participating hospitals and physicians that may not otherwise be available.
Legal News Alert is part of our ongoing commitment to providing up-to-the-minute information about pressing concerns or industry issues affecting our clients and our colleagues. If you have any questions about this update or would like to discuss this topic further, please contact your Foley attorney or the following:
Lawrence C. ConnLos Angeles, California213.firstname.lastname@example.org
C. Frederick Geilfuss IIMilwaukee, Wisconsin414.email@example.com
Lawrence B. LitwakBoston, Massachusetts617.firstname.lastname@example.org
Chris E. RossmanDetroit, Michigan313.email@example.com
Brandon O. YoungMilwaukee, Wisconsin414.firstname.lastname@example.org
Torrey K. YoungBoston, Massachusetts617.email@example.com